AFGE Local 2113 - OGE450
Confidential Financial Disclosure Report
A new regulation (5 CFR 2634) was issued in 1992 describing who should
file confidential financial disclosure reports. Also in 1992, the number
of persons required at NAWCTSD to file confidential reports jumped to 921
from only 220 in 1991. In a memorandum, dated September 14, 1994, the director of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE writes the governing CFR regulation),
indicated that the 1992 regulation, though it granted more flexibility in
designating filers, was not intended to increase the number of filers.
Since that time, the general counsels of DoD and DoN have issued memoranda
suggesting ways in which employees may be excepted from filing.
The Office of Government Ethics (OGE), DOD Office of General Counsel,
General Counsel of the Navy, SecArmy, and COMNAVSUPSYSCOM, all issued
guidance reducing requirements for "micropurchasers" to file OGE
Confidential Financial Disclosure reports. "Micropurchasers" are currently
defined as persons whose combined annual purchases total less than $100,000.
If, after reviewing the guidance linked below, you suspect that you
may have been inappropriately required to file one or more OGE 450 reports, we
would like to hear from you, and we ask that you please complete and
return our OGE 450 survey.
-
Guidance from Director OGE
(9/14/94): "While the 1992 regulation offered greater flexibility to agencies, it had
the unintended effect of increasing the number of filers." (DAEOgram# DO94031;
If you get "document contains no data" errors, keep trying, or try
here and
open DO94031.)
-
Guidance from DOD General Counsel, General Counsel of the Navy, SecArmy
(8/99-1/00) "micro-purchasers who make
annual purchases totaling less than ... (... $100,000), shall be
excluded from filing the OGE Form 450."
(Note: The letter from DOD General Counsel contains two typographical errors: It should reference "5 CFR
2634.904(a)(1)(ii)" instead of "5 CFR 2534.904(a)(!)(ii)")
- Guidance from
ComNavSupSysCom (3/23/00) (search for "OGE") Since NavSupSysCom is a
different chain of command from ours, ComNavSupSysCom's policy does not apply
to us, but it does raise the question: "Why are we doing it differently
here?")
- Joint Ethics
Regulation (Supervisor discretion, see sec. 7-300: Individuals Required to File (Word version)(text version))
-
OGE 450: A Review Guide: storage and handling, p. 4: "should be maintained in locked
cabinets and passed between offices with the utmost care, to ensure that
unauthorized personnel do not have access to them.";
over-designation of filers (
DO-94-031, 9/14/94;
If you get "document contains no data" errors, keep trying, or try
here and
open DO94031.), p. 49: "... 1992 regulation ... had the
unintended effect of increasing the number
of filers. In order to correct this over-designation, we strongly urge
agencies to reevaluate their designations .... not all employees who must
sign a procurement integrity certification ... must ... file a confidential
financial disclosure report.... at OGE ... those desk officers, management
analysts, and attorneys who ... do not have supervisory responsibilities
will no longer be required to file."; official time
(
DO-95-043, 12/13/95;
If you get "document contains no data" errors, keep trying, or try
here and
open DO95043.), p. 53: "because completion of the SF 450 or
SF 278 is a requirement of their Government position, they should be allowed
to use reasonable periods of official time in amounts to be deterined by their
ageency". (Total document is 68 pp. in pdf format (Adobe Acrobat Reader
required)).
- DOD general Guidance concerning OGE 450 (sample instructions for designation
and collection of the reports)
- Links at Wright-Patterson AFB to OGE Regulations and Federal Register Notices
- OGE Site index contains many
links to related stuff: relevant Executive Orders, guidance,
opinions, Federal Register and CFR entries
- Ethics Counselor's Deskbook 2000
- 5 CFR 2634 Executive Branch Financial Disclosure ...
- 5 CFR 2634.904 Confidential Filer Defined
- 5 CFR 2634.905 Exclusions from filing requirements
Various parts of the information which is linked above was brought to
attention of Geoffrey Chun (General Counsel, NAWCTSD) on 16 and 22 November
2000, Frank Jamison (deputy head, Research & Engineering) on 14 December 2000,
and Captain Don R. Gagnon (CO,
NAWCTSD). After interest had been expressed by Ray Malatino (Executive
Director, NAWCTSD), Captain Gagnon was briefed by Local 2113 on 04 June
2001 and was
provided copies of relevant pages, specifically including the
DirOGE's memorandum DO-94-031 indicating that the 1992 regulation was
not intended to increase the number of filers and urging agencies to
reevaulate their designations, and the memos from GC's DoD and DoN,
SecArmy, and ComNavSupSysCom. At that time, Capt Gagnon informed
members of the Local 2113 Executive Board that Geoffrey Chun was already
reexamining designation criteria at NAWCTSD. After the presentation,
Capt Gagnon asked what Local 2113 proposed.
Having pointed out that confidential
filing requirements at NAWCTSD jumped from 220 in 1991 to 921 in 1992,
we suggested that Management might revert to designation
criteria in effect for 1991.
Information, which was received in December 2001 in response to a FOIA request
from Local 2113, suggests that some change probably was made to NAWCTSD
designation criteria in 2001 (see table below), but the number of persons
who were required to file in 2001 is still considerably greater than it was
in 1991. Though Local 2113 brought this matter to the
attention of Management, we did not participate in designing the new designation
criteria, and we have not requested to negotiate on this matter, but it is a
possible subject for negotiation at contract renewal times.
Grievability and arbitrability of filing designations has already been
tested by AFGE Local 3258. In 53 FLRA No. 115
(Feb 19, 1998, go to
http://www.flra.gov/decisions/start/searchpg.html and search for
"0-AR-2734"), it was determined that designation to file OGE 450
was grievable and arbitrable; however, subsequent to
that case,
5 CFR 2634.906 was rewritten to
specifically exclude such grievability or arbitration (thereby nullifying
the effect of 0-AR-2734). In that change, it was clarified that the
agency head (or his designee) is the "sole and exclusive" and final review
authority
(63 FR 15273-15274). For employees represented by Local
2113, the "agency" is the Department of the Navy
(5 CFR 2634.105(b),
5 USC 102), and
the designee for DoN is the Office of the
General Counsel (DoN). OGC, DoN can be contacted at:
Office of the General Counsel
Department of the Navy
1000 Navy Pentagon
Washington DC 20350-1000
Through the Freedom of Information Act, AFGE Local 2113 has obtained the following data describing filing requirements in past years.
| Year |
Required Confidential filers |
Required Public filers |
Total NAWCTSD workforce(9/30) |
| 1990 |
|
3 |
|
| 1991 |
220 |
4 |
|
| 1992 |
921 |
3 |
|
| 1993 |
870 |
2 |
|
| 1994 |
833 |
1 |
1061 |
| 1995 |
858 |
2 |
1051 |
| 1996 |
795 |
2 |
1044 |
| 1997 |
841 |
2 |
1059 |
| 1998 |
856 |
2 |
1076 |
| 1999 |
863 |
3 |
1065 |
| 2000 |
904 |
1 |
1109 |
| 2001 |
618 |
2 |
1090 |
| 2002 |
823 |
4 |
1153 |
| 2003 |
867 |
2 |
1067 |
| 2004 |
850 |
2 |
1030 |
This page was last updated on February 23, 2005