 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Image Arithmetic |
|
|
|
zom.jpg - 232x132 - 7.8k fishbowl.jpg 165x134 - 9k |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once again, here are the original images. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Addition |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
232x132 - 7.8k |
|
|
|
|
|
ADD: Divisor=3, Bias=2 This is the first attempt without additional editing. |
|
|
|
zom_fish.jpg |
|
|
|
232x132 - 9.6k |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COLOR CORRECTED Colors/Adjust/Brightness&Contrast/ B=10, C=30 Colors/Adjust/HSL/H=3, S=50, L=-5 |
|
|
|
|
intrigued.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
232x132 - 11.5k |
|
|
|
|
|
POSTERIZED Colors/Posterize/2 bits per channel The image of Zom now takes on an almost ‘illustrated’ quality, like the fishbowl art. Note: It seems better to apply any special effects to an image before reducing the file. Work large, then resample. |
|
|
|
|
i_post.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
232x132 - 12k |
|
|
|
|
|
HOT WAXED Image/Special Effects/Hot Wax I added hot wax to the color corrected image to get a really cool stained glass effect. Each additional operation increases the size of the file slightly. It’s unfortunate that I had to reduce the originals, losing some great detail. At 200% enlargement it’s a much better experience.. especially this one. |
|
|
|
|
i_hotwax.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtraction |
|
|
|
165x134 - 6k |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBTRACTED Image/Arithmetic/Subtract/ Divisor=2, Bias=2 In this case, I reversed the order of arithmetic. I placed the fishbowl image in the “image 1” position and the cat image in #2 position. This operation made the #2 image (the cat image) negative but kept the fish positive. Note: The image that is in the #1 position is the one that will determine the dimensional size of the combined images. |
|
|
|
|
zomfish4.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
165x134 - 9.5k |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COLOR CORRECTED I took the subtracted image and performed the follow steps to get the best detail possible: Colors/Adjust/Hue, Saturation, Luminance/ H=0, S=90, L=90 Colors/Adjust/Gamma Correction @ 2.25 Note: I could have gotten a lighter initial image (above) by using a Divisor of 1, however this would burn out too much of the detail. Better to start darker and correct from there. |
|
|
|
|
subtract.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
232x132 - 10.6k |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBTRACTED Image/Arithmetic/Subtract/ Divisor=1, Bias=2 Here I went back to the original order with the cat pic in the #1 position and again, subtraction made a negative of the #2 image (this time the fishbowl). Since my images were not of equal dimensions, I preferred this order to keep the cat from distorting but to allow the fishbowl and fish to distort in an interesting way that actually improved the composition. (imho) |
|
|
|
|
subtract2.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiply |
|
|
|
 |
|
232x132 - 10k |
|
|
|
|
|
MULTIPLIED Image/Arithmetic/Multiply/Divisor=240, Bias=0 This setting seemed to get the best result. I’m not sure I understand the full concept of multiplying the imagags. Does anyone have an easy-to-understand explanation? One thing I did note: this function provided the absolute best quality of detail by far without further editing. |
|
|
|
|
multiply.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divide |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
232x132 - 12k |
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDED Image/Arithmetic/Divide/Divisor=1, Bias=2 This has to be the weirdest. Dividing seems to make parts of each image negative. |
|
|
|
|
|
divide.jpg |
|
|
|
165x134 - 10k |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVIDED Image/Arithmetic/Divide/Divisor=1, Bias=2 All I did here was reverse the order of the images again: fishbowl.jpg / zom.jpg = divide.jpg Since fishbowl.jpg was first, that became the predominant size. |
|
|
|
|
divide2.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lightest |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
232x132 - 8.6k |
|
|
|
|
|
Lightest Image/Arithmetic/Lightest/Divisor=1, Bias=0 This shows the lightest operation taking the lightest pixel from image 1 or 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
lightest.jpg |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
232x132 - 8.6k |
|
|
|
|
|
Lightest Image/Arithmetic/Lightest/Divisor=2, Bias=0 This shows the lightest operation taking the lightest pixel from image 1 or 2. Same operation as above, different divisor. I’ll have to try different images with this one.. to see if I can come up with anything better than this. |
|
|
|
|
light2.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darkest |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
232x132 - 10k |
|
|
|
|
|
Darkest Image/Arithmetic/Darkest/Divisor=1, Bias=0 This shows the darkest operation taking the darkest pixel from image 1 or 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
darkest.jpg |
|
|
|
That concludes the Image Arithmetic for Lesson 3. FOLLOW ZOM’s PAWS to review the remaining exersizes.. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
I refuse to follow a cat. Take me back to the PSP main page, PSP LESSONS. |
|
|