INTELLIGENCE: OUTLINE
Measuring intelligence
- how each person is unique, compared to other people
- approach is correlational, what "goes together" statistically
Validity
- Does the test measure what it's supposed to?
- Are inferences based on the test scores correct?
Types of validity
- content validity: content of the test represents the content of the domain "intelligent behavior"
- predictive validity: test scores predict other, later, behavior of interest
- concurrent validity: test scores are related to other current behavior of interest
- construct validity: the whole case supporting the validity of a test, a nomological
network of different kinds of evidence supporting validity
- "face" validity: intuitive judgment that the measure seems reasonable
Reliability
- are the test scores stable, repeatable?
- test-retest reliability: are test scores stable over a reasonable time period?
- split-half and internal consistency reliability: are scores stable over different versions of test?
- are test scores the same irrespective of who the tester is?
Some notes on reliability and validity
- you can have reliable measures that aren't valid
- without good reliability you can't assess validity adequately
- face validity is inadequate as a basis for conclusions about the validity of a measure
Standardization
- procedures, equipment, instructions and conditions are standardized
- test development includes deriving group norms against which to compare individual scores
- individual scores are compared against the normal distribution of scores for their age range
from the standardization sample
- a variety of standardized scores can be computed, for example, percentiles, stanines.
History
- early approaches based on measuring skull
- Galton's approach based on reaction time, other sensory functions
Binet (1904)
- test for French schoolchildren needing special education.
- concept of Mental Age (MA).
- Intelligence regarded as a measure of current mental functioning, fluid
Terman (1916)
- The Stanford-Binet test, developed from Binet
- concept of Intelligence Quotient: I.Q.= MA/CA x 100 (Stern's ratio IQ)
- perceived intelligence as a fixed and inherited entity
World War 1
- Group I.Q. tests developed, Army Alpha and Beta.
Wechsler (1939)
- WISC & WAIS, commonly used today
- concept of Deviation I.Q., compare people to others of same age
- developed performance subtests in addition to verbal subtests
- gave profiles of strengths and weaknesses
Defining intelligence
- intelligence is an inferred internal psychological construct
- there are many definitions, with two general themes
- ability to learn from experience
- ability to adapt to one's environment
- Psychometric approach: factors
- Spearman's "g": there is a general factor in intelligence
this is inferred from intercorrelations among subtests
- Thurstone's primary mental abilities: there is a set of specific factors comprising
intelligence
this is inferred from the relative independence of different abilities (also refer to savants, and the
performance of people with brain damage)
- Sternberg's Triarchic Theory:
- analytic
- creative
- practical
- Gardner's multiple intelligences:
- linguistic
- logical-mathematical
- spatial
- musical
- body-kinesthetic
- interpersonal
- intrapersonal
- process approaches to intelligence: focus on
- speed of mental activities
- strategies of information processing (metacognition)
- fluid and crystallized intelligence
- fluid intelligence is based on problem solving
- with age fluid intelligence declines
- crystallized intelligence is based on acquired knowledge
- crystallized intelligence can compensate for decline in fluid intelligence with age
Heredity or environment?
- higher correlations with genetic closeness, irrespective of environment
- changes in IQ with different, impoverished or enriched environments
- genetics sets potential, environment nurtures or stunts its development
- group differences in IQ, controversies
- changes over the lifespan
Uses and abuses of intelligence testing
- pervasive use, but not always appropriate, e.g. job specific skills
- labeling and the issue of self-fulfilling prophecies (ref. Rosenthal study)
- cultural bias in tests (which is often also mirrored in criteria, e.g.. job performance)
- pretty good correlation between IQ and academic success in high school
but not at higher levels (restriction of range, other factors also very important)
- High or low IQ guarantees nothing - neither success nor failure, nor level of life satisfaction!