Galileo has performed seven close fly-bys of the moon Io. In all orbits but the 24th, there is a mysterious spike in the star scanner’s radiation measurements peaking within a few radii of the moon. An example can be seen in this figure:

Star Scanner Data for the I25A
Orbit. The count rate is the star scanner’s native unit uncorrected for several
small instrument biases. C/A is the time of Closest Approach to Io. MEC is the
time of the predicted Magnetic Equator Crossing. RJ = Jovian Radii = 71,492 km.
When
the star scanner is looking straight at a star, it reports its brightness. When
it is looking away from a star, it reports total noise which is a combination
of dim stars, nebula, etc in the background and radiation-induced noise. The pattern
of dim lights is known and can be subtracted off the total noise figure giving just
a measure of the radiation.
The
spike in radiation counts, if caused by an unexpected light source, seems to be
at least as bright as the star Alpha Centauri, to possibly 120 times that.
There is a roughly exponential decline over the course of a few minutes and
over a few thousand km as Galileo moves away from Io. This could be a real
measurement but it is also consistent with how the star scanner returns to
normal after being “blinded” by very bright light.
There
are several possible causes of these spikes listed here with the latter two
having the strongest support:
1)
High energy particles spilling off Io It was
discovered early during the Galileo mission that there are high energy
particles over the polar regions of Io [5]. Essentially, Io is a contact point in a huge stream of electricity
flowing between Jupiter’s poles along its magnetic field lines. On the 24th
orbit, Galileo made its only equatorial pass of Io and saw no spike - this
would seem to be compatible with the idea of polar “electron beams”. However,
on other orbits where the spike was observed by the star scanner, Galileo EPD
measurements of high energy electrons showed no evidence of this spike [17].
2)
Stray light The idea here is that light from Io is
reflecting around inside the star scanner’s baffle or otherwise leaking into the
star scanner core. This is not likely due to:
Ø
This
only happens at Io even though Europa has higher albedo and Galileo has flown
by at similar distances to this and other Galilean moons.
Ø
The
star scanner is powered down for a portion of each revolution when there is a
possibility of stray light entering the device. Several in-house studies have
said that this is not happening. The power-down technique has been used
successfully for every other moon and planet that Galileo has passed.
Ø
The
star scanner, independent of radiation measurements, reports star intensity.
Nothing unusual was seen there.
3)
Sunlight reflected off of dust and gas Io’s
volcanoes are very active. There are many visible light images that
show blue plumes extending hundreds of kilometers above the surface of Io. A
diffuse light source filling the star scanner slit could be much dimmer than a
pinprick of a star and yet provide the same amount of light response. The star scanner is most sensitive to blue
and near UV light.
4)
Spacecraft glow This has not been observed
at Jupiter but it seems quite plausible that, in the vicinity of Io with its
thin atmosphere of SO2 and O2, some sort of a chemical
reaction is occurring on or near the spacecraft surfaces. This effect has been
observed with the Space Shuttle and other low earth orbiting spacecraft
although those reactions often seem to involve nitrogen. Galileo carries a
solid state camera which has not reported any evidence of this glow while
immersed in it. However, the spike is limited to regions near Io and,
unfortunately, this is when the camera would have been pointed to the bright
surface below and thus washed out any diffuse glow. It is interesting to note
that Galileo’s Plasma Subsystem detected particles as high as 500 km above the
surface of Io. Even when the plumes are in darkness, a blue fluorescence of the
plume itself has been noted by Galileo’s camera looking from a distance.
BACK