The Bookbag

OK, I have got to make my mind up on about this page. First
it was going to be regular book reviews. Then it turned into an
annotated bibliography. Then it started morphing into something
else. The madness must stop, I tell you!!!
So, here's what I'm going to try this time: The annotated
bibliography is going to become part of the Film & Literature section;
it pretty much belongs there anyway. It'll be broken down into two
sections: Shakespeare and Everything Else (simple, but
effective). I'll
keep a link here, just for convenience. This section, though, will
revert to being pretty much a regular book review section.

by Denise Giardina
Generally when you think of historical fiction, even
good historical fiction, you think of massive tomes that pile fact upon minutiae,
as though the writer were writing solely to demonstrate their
mastery of the time period. Even period pieces such as Umberto Eco's
The Name of the Rose has layer upon layer of historical trappings.
Good King Harry stands in stark contrast to most
historical novels. Even though the book, written as an autobiography
of Henry V, encompasses the entirety of Prince Hal's adult life, Giardina
pares away the historical litany to a bare minimum, so that the focus
remains squarely on Henry's character. She walks a very careful
tightrope: on the one hand, just enough historical detail that we can
understand and appreciate the differences between Harry's time and
hours--specifically, the sort of absolute power wielded by any medieval
monarch; on the other, not so much history that the differences between
Harry and us prevent us from identifying with the various dilemmas,
private and political, that he struggles to resolve.
The result is a Harry who leaps off the page as
intriguing and as vital as Shakespeare's Prince Hal. The classic
characters, of course, remain--Sir John Oldcastle (the basis for
Shakespeare's triumphant Falstaff--Shakespeare renamed the character when
the Oldcastle family threatened legal action), Henry IV--deeply conflicted
not only over the legitimacy of his rule, but equally conflicted in his
relationship to Harry, and, of course, Harry himself, who beats all odds in
succeeding to the English throne, and then further beats the odds by
proving to be an effective monarch.
Home | Lit & Film | TV
| Bialystock
& Bloom | Links | Meet the
Author! | E-Mail |