[By Subject] [By Date] [By Sender [By Thread]
Previous In Time

Next in Time

From: six@uhf.wireless.net
Subject: re: Dayton Johnson's 1296 double rhombic.
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 22:30:42 -0500 (EST)

> Thus, to transmit, the Rhombic would have merit but for receiving it's gain
> wouldn't necessarily improve an incoming station's signal to noise ratio and
> that's what we're really after.
> Hi James:

I understand noise figure, I just forgot G/T.. Thanks for the explanation.

However, from looking at the picture in QST, I get the impression the antenna is actually a RESONANT double rhombic employing no termination resistor (at least I hope it is).

We wrote a snail letter to Dayton. Let's see what comes back.


Bernie nu1s

`------ Submissions: vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu Subscription/removal requests: vhf-request@w6yx.stanford.edu Human list administrator: vhf-approval@w6yx.stanford.edu