[By Subject] [By Date] [By Sender [By Thread]
Previous In Time

Next in Time

From: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: My Spread Spectrum Letter to FCC
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 09:12:32 +0000
Greg Jones, WD5IVD wrote on behalf of TAPR:


>It is our feeling that communications to the
>level you are interested in having listed every day are better handled
>at the local level (over coffee at donuts) than some nation wide
>posting of logs, where...

As an outside observer - but with an interest in both weak-signal working and band-planning - I have to disagree.

The only way to assess the interference issue rigorously is to include it fully in the formal experimental program. Relegating the interference issue to "the local level" will exclude it from the big picture. Likewise, restricting the evaluation of weak-signal interference to TAPR's nominees within the program is a bad move, both technically and politically.


>the information I post only effects people within a limited
>geographic area (i.e.,. not in Maine since I am in Austin :-).

That isn't the point: the point is to generate and publish a complete record of the work, that can be analysed to extract general trends from a collection of localized data.


>I would
>rather have people spending time locally discussing what they are doing and
>working on their experiments, then having to spend time ensuring that their
>daily logs were posted on the Internet.

The experiments are not complete until they are reported; and they are not reported until they are published and shared with everybody. The "people... working on their experiments" of whom you speak are of course the participants; what about the non-participants who might be affected?

The concern of weak-signal operators is not really about interference from this limited test: it is about the potential for much more severe interference from multiple sources if SS becomes widespread. This test may be the only opportunity to collect data under controlled conditions, and there is no way to do that without public access to the participants' logs.

Amamteur bands have to carry the traffic of many diverse interests, each of which has equal rights. I support the SS experiments (which will surely come to this country too) but at present TAPR does not seem to be giving sufficient recognition to the effects of its own particular enthusiasms upon other users.

`73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) Professionally: IFW Technical Services Clear technical English - world-wide. ------ Submissions: vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu Subscription/removal requests: vhf-request@w6yx.stanford.edu Human list administrator: vhf-approval@w6yx.stanford.edu