[By Subject] [By Date] [By Sender [By Thread]
Previous In Time

Next in Time

From: six@uhf.wireless.net
Subject: Re: Re[2]: My Spread Spectrum Letter to FCC
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 09:41:30 -0500 (EST)

> Obviously, part 15 devices DO NOT belong in the ham bands-shouldnt we be
> more interested in getting these devices OUT of our bands??? Never
> should have been there to start with...

Will never happen! 900 MHz. is another wasteland that the FCC doesn't give a damn about and it is quite happy about the proliferation of ISM SS equipment.

> Obviously, 50 or 100 part 15 devices operating within a mile or 2 of the
> weak signal user is going to create probs (whether ists SS or not).

So how much money are you prepared to pay to the FCC for exclusive access to 902-928 MHz?

Bernie ------ Submissions: vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu Subscription/removal requests: vhf-request@w6yx.stanford.edu Human list administrator: vhf-approval@w6yx.stanford.edu