.gif)
The American Civil Liberties
Union (ACLU)
Point of order! Who is being punished and treated cruelly, the inmates or the deputies? Sensible, sane people know the answer. The ACLU threatened to legally pursue the matter. I’d like to suggest the inmates are tossing their “leftovers” in the wrong direction and at the wrong people. A TV Station polled the local citizens, and 79 percent of them sided with the sheriff. It stands without saying that the ACLU has lost touch with logic, reality, and morality. But read on for more.
So just what did our founding fathers have in mind when they formulated this document? Was it their intention to dismantle the Christian movement? Did they hope to remove God from all federal, state, and civic premises? Were they anti-Deity? Did they initiate a political doctrine that would deny school children, during school hours, the right to address the God of heaven voluntarily? Before we can comprehend the message our founding fathers hoped to establish and expected to convey, it is essential that we understand religious and political conditions in those countries from where our forefathers fled.
To express the issue in simpler terms, the Governments of these countries controlled and legislated religion—but only because those Governments were dominated and controlled by established sects. In some cases, organized religion was the slave of the State. In other cases, the State was the slave of organized religion. This, and only this, is what many of our forefathers fled. And because of this political-religious configuration, our founding fathers felt constrained to add the religious clause to our Constitution.
In America, religion may not master or aggressively influence Government. This is precisely what the Supreme Court meant in 1962 when they authored a decision on prayers in public schools. Schools do not have the prerogative to establish religious procedures, organize religious prayer groups, or otherwise sponsor, support, or formally condone a religious creed. Now, where does all of this bring us?
None of these elements are involved in the “Prayers in Public Schools” controversy. Atheists and the ACLU would like to convince us, and indeed have convinced a large segment of our nation’s population, that our Constitution is infringed upon when public school children are given permission to pray voluntarily or read their Bibles.
We must understand the motive and rationale behind the ACLU’s crusade. It appears that praying in and on public school premises is only the surface of their overall goal. If you have been following the lewd performances of the ACLU through the years, you have observed that they are most always opposed to anything that has either religion or God associated with it.
Apparently, we are not dealing with some organization that is simply crusading against innovations that would violate our Constitution. There are strong indications we are dealing with an anti-God and anti-spiritual political party or cult that is devoted to totally removing God and America’s spiritual foundation from our culture and from our society.
The ACLU will not lift a finger to stop the distribution of printed material in public schools pertaining to biological and genetical evolution, in spite of the fact that the printed material is anti-God. I charge that genetical evolution, as taught in public school textbooks, is anti-God printed matter in that it attributes all matter, whether organic or inorganic, to sources other than a supreme Creator. Biological evolution does not credit any form of life to a supernatural Power. In other words, anti-God textbooks and practices are promoted in our public schools, but pro-God printed material and practices may not be promoted in public schools. Is this freedom of speech and press?
I chuckle at the ACLU when they campaign for “separation of Church and State” while accepting and playing bosom-buddy to every penny and every dollar that bears the inscription, “In God we trust.” And when they sing our National Anthem, do they play shut-mouth when they approach the words that refer to God? Do they affirm, “So help me God,” in a court of law when asked if they will tell the truth? Or do their vocal cords cease to function? Do they rush to court instead of affirming “One nation under God” when they’re reciting the Pledge of Allegiance?
You see, none of these exercises merge Church and State. Church and State remain separated in spite of them. Then why is there so much controversy over a little simple prayer, and voluntary at that, in public schools?
In November, 1987, Reader’s Digest accused the ACLU of defending “the free flow of pornography by arguing that a book never harmed anyone.” The ACLU’s reputation and history speak for themselves.
We dare not permit this great country to become a tool of atheists and skeptics and anti-spiritual intellectuals. Brute force, however, is not the answer, for brute force generates brute force. I would remind you that a certain Man changed the world without throwing a rock, burning a building, or drawing a sword.
There will never be another like him! His method is the only method endorsed by the God of creation. We are not involved in a carnal warfare, the great apostle Paul affirmed. We are participants in a spiritual warfare, and the force that commands our enemies is Satan himself, dressed up in the likes of anti-God organizations.
Our founding fathers fled to this great country because Church and State were incorporated, not separated, and freedom of religion was stifled and, in many cases, prohibited. The strong dictatorial arm of particular religions, such as Catholicism and The Established Church of England, reached out to enslave and, in many cases, kill those who dared question their authority. This was done by the States’ approval and support. This is what our founding fathers fled. They no doubt would have welcomed the freedom to pray anywhere, publicly or otherwise, and to read their Bibles at any time, whether in school or in the halls of parliament.
2) The 1962 ruling by the Supreme Court did not outlaw voluntary prayers in public schools. The ruling outlawed official or State-sponsored prayers. The school is an arm of the State. And the State cannot establish a particular religion through any of its agencies.
3) This country’s very foundation is being disrupted and shaken by atheists, skeptics, pagan intellectuals, and the ACLU. These people appear to be set on a course to eliminate God and spirituality from our culture and from our society. They must be opposed on every level. To stick our heads in the sand and do nothing is to surrender and admit defeat. This we must not do. This we will not do.
4) A fact so obvious it is hardly worth mentioning is that he ACLU supports almost any form of legislation that tears at our nation’s moral and spiritual fiber, but opposes any legislation that would make our nation morally and spiritually stronger. This in itself should be sufficient evidence to convince any independent thinker that the ACLU and her sister organizations are bent on surrendering our nation to a primitive and godless era similar to the deceased Roman Empire.
