Synoptic Problem Bibliography

A List of References on the Synoptic Problem (Suggestions welcome)

[ A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z ]

Abbott 1879
E. A. A., "Gospels" in The Encyclopædia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and General Literature 10 (Philadelphia: J. M. Stoddart, 9th ed.; American reprint, 1879): 702-49.
Abbott 1901
Edwin A. Abbott, The Corrections of Mark Adopted by Matthew and Luke (Diatessarica 2; London: Black, 1901).
Abbott 1913
Edwin A. Abbot, The Fourfold Gospel: Introduction (Diatessarica 10; Cambridge: University Press, 1913).
Abbott & Rushbrooke 1884
Edwin A. Abbott & W. G. Rushbrooke, The Common Tradition of the Synoptic Gospels in the Text of the Revised Version (London: Macmillan and Co., 1884).
On-line version, pp. v-xi, ed., Stephen C. Carlson at Synoptic Problem.
Abogunrin 1987, * 1990
Samuel Oyinloye Abogunrin, "The Synoptic Gospel Debate: A Re-Examination in an African Context," African Journal of Biblical Sudies 2 (1987) 25-51.
*Reprinted as "The Synoptic Gospel Debate: A Re-Examination from an African Point of View" in Interrelations of the Gospels (Dungan 1990a: 381-407).
Aichinger 1976
Hermann Aichinger, "Quellekritische Untersuchung der Perikope vom Ährenraufen am Sabbat" [A Source Critical Examination of the Pericope of Plucking Grain on the Sabbath], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 1 (1978) 110-153.
Aichinger 1978
Hermann Aichinger, " Zur Traditionsgeschichte der Epileptiker-Perikope Mk 9,14-29 par Mt 17,14-21 par Lk 9,37-43a" [The Tradition History of the Pericope of the Epileptic Mk 9:14-29 || Mt 17:14-21 || Lk9:37-43a], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 3 (1978) 114-143.
Aland 1964, 3 1965
Kurt Aland, ed., Synopsis Quattuor Evangeliorum: Locis parallelis evangeliorum apocryphorm et patrum adhibitis edidit (Stuttgart: Württembergische Bibelanstalt Stuttgart, 1964; 3d ed., 1965).
Aland 1972, 10 1993
Kurt Aland, ed., Synopsis of the Four Gospels: Greek-English Edition of the Synopsis Quattuor Evangeliorum, on the basis of the Greek Text of Nestle-Aland 26th Edition and Greek New Testament 3rd Edition (Corrected) (Stuttgart: German Bible Society, 1972; 10th ed., 1993).
Albright & Mann 1971
W. F. Albright & C. S. Mann, Matthew: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (The Anchor Bible 26; New York: Doubleday, 1971).
Allen 3 1912
Willoughby C. Allen, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. Matthew (The International Critical Commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments; Edinburgh, T&T Clark, 3d ed., 1912).
Allison 1997
Dale C. Allison, Jr., The Jesus Tradition in Q (Harrisburg, Penn.: Trinity Press Int'l, 1997).
Argyle 1963
A. W. Argyle, The Gospel According to Matthew (The Cambridge Bible Commentary on the New English Bible; Cambridge: University Press, 1963).
Argyle 1964, *1985
A. W. Argyle, "Evidence for the View that St. Luke Used St. Matthew's Gospel" Journal of Biblical Literature 83 (1964): 390-96.
*Reprinted in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 371-79).
Barr 1938, 2 1995
Allan Barr, A Diagram of Synoptic Relationships (1938) with a new introduction by James Barr (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2d ed., 1995).
Barrett 1942-43, * 1985
C. K. Barrett, "Q: A Re-examination," Expository Times 54 (1942-43): 320-23.
* Reprinted in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 259-68).
Bauckham 1998
Richard Bauckham, ed., The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospels Audiences (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1998).
Bellinzoni 1985
Arthur J. Bellinzoni, Jr., ed., with the assistance of Joseph B. Tyson and William O. Walker, Jr., The Two-Source Hypothesis: A Critical Appraisal (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1985).
Benoit & Boismard 1965, 2 1977
P. Benoit & M.-E. Boismard, Synopse des Quattre Évangiles en Français avec parallèles des apocryphes et des pères, Tome I: Textes (2d rev. & corr. ed. P. Sandevoir 1977; Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1965).
Black 1946, 3 1967
Matthew Black, An Aramaic Approach to the Gospels and Acts (1946; 3d. ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967).
Blass 1898
Friedrich Blass, Philology of the Gospels (London: Macmillan, 1898).
Bleek 1862, 2 1866, ET 1883
Johannes Friedrich Bleek, Einleitung in das Neue Testament (Berlin: Reimer, 1862; 2d ed. 1866); English trans. by William Urwich (Clark's Foreign Theological Library 24; Edinburgh: T. &. T. Clark, 1883).
Blomberg 1997
Craig L. Blomberg, Jesus and the Gospels: An Introduction and Survey (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1997).
Boismard 1980
M.-E. Boismard, "The Two-Source Theory at an Impasse," English trans. by Lorraine Caza et al., New Testament Studies 26 (1980): 1-17.
Boismard 1972
P. Benoit & M.-E. Boismard, Synopse des Quattre Évangiles en Français, Tome II: Commentaire par M.-E. Boismard avec la collaboration de A. Lamoille et P. Sandevoir, Préface de P. Benoit (Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1972).
Boismard 1977
P. Benoit & M.-E. Boismard, Synopse des Quattre Évangiles en Français, Tome III: L'Évangile de Jean: Commentaire par M.-É. Boismard et A. Lamouille avec la collaboration de G. Rochais (Paris, Les Éditions du Cerf, 1977).
Boismard 1990
Marie-Émile Boismard, "Théorie des niveaux multiples" in Interrelations of the Gospels (Dungan 1990a: 231-43).
Boismard ET 1992
M.-É. Boismard, "Two-Source Hypothesis," English trans. by Terrence Prendergast in The Anchor Bible Dictionary (Freedman 1992: 6:679-82).
Boltz 1981
David Herman Boltz, Synoptic Asymetry: An Inter-Disciplinary Approach to the Synoptic Problem (Ph.D. diss.; Univ. Texas at Arlington, 1981).
Bornkamm 1958
Günther Bornkamm, "Evangelien, Synoptische" in Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (3d ed.; Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1958) 2:754-66.
Bradby 1956-7, * 1985
E. L. Bradby, "In Defence of Q," Expository Times 68 (1956-7): 315-18.
* Reprinted in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 287-93).
Brown 1997
Raymond E. Brown, An Introduction to the New Testament (The Anchor Bible Reference Library; New York: Doubleday, 1997).
Brown et al. 1990
Raymond E. Brown, Joseph A. Fitzmyer & Roland E. Murphy, eds., The New Jerome Biblical Commentary (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1990).
Buckley 1912
Eric Rede Buckley, An Introduction to the Synoptic Problem (London: Edward Arnold, 1912).
Burkitt 1907
F. Crawford Burkitt, The Gospel History and its Transmission (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 2d ed., 1907).
Büsching 1766
Anton Friedrich Büsching, Die vier Evangelisten mit ihren eigenen Worten zusammengesetzt und mit Erklärungen versehen (Hamburg: 1766).
Butler 1951, * 1985
B. C. Butler, The Originality of St. Matthew: A Critique of the Two-Document Hypothesis (Cambridge: University Press, 1951).
* Pages 62-71 reprinted as "The Lachman Fallacy" in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 133-142).
Butler 1969, * 1985
B. C. Butler, "The Synoptic Problem" in A New Catholic Commentary on Holy Scriptures, R. C. Fuller, L. Johnston, & C. Kearns, eds., (Nelson, 1969) 815-21;
* Reprinted in Two-Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 97-118).
Bultmann 3 1958, ET 1963
Rudolph Bultmann, Die Geschichte der synoptischen Tradition (3d ed., 1958), English trans, John Marsh, History of the Synoptic Tradition (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, rev. ed., 1963).
Buttrick 1970
David G. Buttrick, ed., Jesus and Man's Hope 1 (Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh Theological Seminary, 1970).
Carlson 2001
Stephen C. Carlson, "Clement of Alexandria on the 'Order' of the Gospels," New Testament Studies 47 (2001): 118-25.
Carson et al. 1992
D. A. Carson, Douglas J. Moo, & Leon Morris, An Introduction to the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 1992).
Casey 1998
Maurice Casey, Aramaic Sources of Mark's Gospel (Society for New Testament Studies, Monograph Series 102; Cambridge: University Press, 1998).
Catchpole 1992
David R. Catchpole, "The Beginning of Q: A Proposal," New Testament Studies 38 (1992): 205-21.
Chapman 1937
John Chapman, edited with an introduction and some additional matter by John M. T. Barton, Matthew, Mark and Luke: A Study in the Order and Interrelation of the Synoptic Gospels (London: Longmans, Green, 1937).
Collison 1977
Franklyn J. G. Collison, Linguistic Usages in the Gospel of Luke (Ph. D. dissertation; Southern Methodist University, August 21, 1977).
Cook 1978
Michael J. Cook, Mark's Treatment of the Jewish Leaders (Supplements to the Novum Testamentum 51; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1978).
Cope 1976
O. Lamar Cope, Matthew: A Scribe Trained for the Kingdom of Heaven (The Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 5; Washington, D.C.: The Catholic Biblical Association of America, 1976).
Cope 1983
Lamar Cope, "The Argument Revolves: The Pivotal Evidence for Markan Priority is Reversing Itself" in New Synoptic Studies (Farmer 1983a: 143-157).
Corley 1983
Bruce C. Corley, ed., Colloquy on New Testament Studies: A Time for Reappraisal and Fresh Approaches (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1983).
Crompton 1928
R. H. Crompton, The Synoptic Problem and a New Solution (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1928).
Davidson 1868, 2 1882, 3 1894
Samuel Davidson, An Introduction to the Study of the New Testament: Critical, Exegetical, and Theological (1st ed., 1868; 2d ed., 1882; 3d ed., London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., 1894).
Davies 1988
Stevan L. Davies, The New Testament: A Contemporary Introduction (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1988).
Davies & Allison 1988, 1991, 1997
W. D. Davies & Dale C. Allison, Jr., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. Matthew, vol. 1, (The International Critical Commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments; Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1988), vol. 2 (1991), vol. 3 (1997).
Dickerson 1997
Patrick L. Dickerson, "The New Character Narrative in Luke-Acts and the Synoptic Problem," Journal of Biblical Literature 116 (1997): 291-312.
Downing 1964-65, * 1985
F. G. Downing, "Towards the Rehabilitation of Q," New Testament Studies 11 (1964-65): 169-81
* Reprinted in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 268-85).
Downing 1988
F. Gerald Downing, "Compositional Conventions and the Synoptic Problem," Journal of Biblical Literature 107 (1988): 69-85.
Downing 1992
F. Gerald Downing, "A Paradigm Perplex: Luke, Matthew and Mark," New Testament Studies 38 (1992): 15-36.
Drury 1973
John Drury, The Gospel of Luke: A Commentary on The New Testament in Modern English, the meaning of each passage in its historical setting and its significance today (J. B. Phillips New Testament Commentaries; New York: Macmillan, 1973).
Dunderberg 1995
Ismo Dunderberg, "Q and the Beginning of Mark," New Testament Studies 41 (1995): 501-11.
Dungan 1970, * 1985
David Laird Dungan, "Mark -- The Abridgement of Matthew and Luke" in Jesus and Man's Hope (Buttrick 1970: 1:51-97).
* Pages 1:51-74 reprinted as "Critique of the Main Arguments for Mark's Priority as Formulated by B.H. Streeter" in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 143-61).
* Pages 1:74-80 reprinted as "Critique of the Q Hypothesis" in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 429-33).
Dungan 1983a
David L. Dungan, "The Purpose and Provenance of the Gospel of Mark According to the Two-Gospel (Owen-Griesbach) Hypothesis" in New Synoptic Studies (Farmer 1983a: 411-40).
Dungan 1983b
David L. Dungan, "The Purpose and Provenance of the Gospel of Mark According to the 'Two-Gospel' (Griesbach) Hypothesis" in Colloquy on New Testament Studies (Corley 1983: 133-56).
Dungan 1984
David L. Dungan, "A Griesbachian Perspective on the Argument from Order" in Synoptic Studies (Tuckett 1984b: 67-74).
Dungan 1990a
David L. Dungan, ed., The Interrelations of the Gospels: A Symposium Led by M. É. Boismard - W. R. Farmer - F. Neirynck, Jerusalem 1984 (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 95; Leuven: University Press, 1990).
Dungan 1990b
David L. Dungan, "Synopses of the Future" in Interrelations of the Gospels (Dungan 1990a: 317-47).
Dungan 1992
David L. Dungan, "Two-Gospel Hypothesis" in Anchor Bible Dictionary (Freedman 1992: 6:671-79).
Dungan 1999
David Laird Dungan, A History of the Synoptic Problem: The Canon, the Text, the Composition and the Interpretation of the Gospels (The Anchor Bible Reference Library; New York: Doubleday, 1999).
Dungan & Kloppenborg 1998
David L. Dungan & John S. Kloppenborg, "The Synoptic Problem: How Did We Get Our Gospels?" in International Bible Commentary (Farmer 1998: 1231-40).
Ehrman 1997
Bart D. Ehrman, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).
Elliott 1990
J. K. Elliott, "The Relevance of Textual Criticism to the Synoptic Problem" in Interrelations of the Gospels (Dungan 1990a: 348-59).
Ennulat 1994
Andreas Ennulat, Die "minor agreements": Untersuchungen zu einer offenen Frage des synoptischen Problems [The "Minor Agreements": An Examination of an Open Question of the Synoptic Problem] (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament II/62; Tübingen: Mohr, 1994).
Ewing 1997
Todd William Ewing, An Inquiry into the Preference for Oral Tradition over Literary Solutions to the Synoptic Problem Through an Analysis of the Verbal Agreements in Matthew and Mark (Ph.D. diss.; Southwestern Baptist Theological Sem., 1997).
Farmer 1964, 2 1976, * 1985
William R. Farmer, The Synoptic Problem: A Critical Analysis (Macmillan, 1964; 2d ed., Dillsboro, N.C.: Western North Carolina Press, 1976)
* Pages 199-232 reprinted as "A New Introduction to the Problem" in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 163-97).
On-line précis, Stephen C. Carlson at Synoptic Problem.
On-line summary, Geoff Trowbridge.
Farmer 1975, * 1985
W. R. Farmer, "A Fresh Approach to Q" in Christianity, Judaism and Other Greco-Roman Cults (Neusner 1975: 39-50).
* Reprinted in The Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 397-408).
Farmer 1982
William R. Farmer, Jesus and the Gospel: Tradition, Scripture, and Canon (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982).
Farmer 1983a
William R. Farmer, ed., New Synoptic Studies: The Cambridge Gospel Conference and Beyond (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1983).
Farmer 1983b
William R. Farmer, "A Response to Joseph Fitzmyer's Defense of the Two Document Hypothesis" in New Synoptic Studies (Farmer 1983a: 501-23).
Farmer 1984a
W. R. Farmer, "Certain Results Reached by Sir John C. Hawkins and C. F. Burney Which Make More Sense If Luke Knew Matthew, and Mark Knew Matthew and Luke" in Synoptic Studies (Tuckett 1984b: 75-98).
Farmer 1984b
W. R. Farmer, "Reply to Michael Goulder" in Synoptic Studies (Tuckett 1984b: 105-09).
Farmer 1990
William R. Farmer, "The Statement of the Hypothesis" in Interrelations of the Gospels (Dungan 1990a: 125-56).
Farmer 1994
William R. Farmer, The Gospel of Jesus: The Pastoral Relevance of the Synoptic Problem (Louisville, Ky.: Westminster/John Knox, 1994).
Farmer 1998a
William R. Farmer, ed., The International Bible Commentary: A Catholic and Excumenical Commentary for the Twenty-First Century (Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press, 1998).
Farmer 1998b
William R. Farmer, "The Present State of the Synoptic Problem" in Literary Studies in Luke-Acts: Essays in Honor of Joseph B. Tyson, (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1998) 11-36.
On-line version, ed. Mark Goodacre at Synoptic-L .
On-line version, ed. Thomas R. W. Longstaff at Two Gospel Hypothesis.
Farrer 1951
Austin Farrer, A Study in St Mark (Westminster: Dacre, 1951).
Farrer 1955, * 1985
A. M. Farrer, "On Dispensing with Q" in Studies in the Gospels (Nineham 1955: 55-88).
* Reprinted in The Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 321-56).
On-line version, ed., Mark Goodacre at Mark without Q.
Fee 1978
Gordon D. Fee, "Modern Text Criticism and the Synoptic Problem" in J. J. Griesbach (Orchard & Longstaff 1978: 154-69).
Fee 1980, * 1999
Gordon D. Fee, "A Text-Critical Look at the Synoptic Problem," Novum Testamentum 22 (1980): 12-28.
* Reprinted in The Synoptic Problem and Q (Orton 1999: 163-79).
Fitzmyer 1970, * 1985
Joseph A. Fitzmyer, "The Priority of Mark and the 'Q' Source in Luke" in Jesus and Man's Hope (Buttrick 1970: 1:131-70).
* Pages 1:134-47, 164-66 reprinted as "The Priority of Mark" in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 37-52).
* Pages 1:147-56 reprinted as "Luke's Use of Q" in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 245-57).
Fitzmyer 1981
Joseph A. Fitzmyer, The Gospel According to Luke: Introduction, Translation, and Notes (The Anchor Bible; New York: Doubleday, vol. 28, 1981; vol. 28A, 1985).
Fleddermann 1995
Harry T. Fleddermann, with an assessment by F. Neirynck, Mark and Q: A Study of the Overlap Texts (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 122; Leuven: University Press, 1995).
Focant 1993
Camille Focant, ed., The Synoptic Gospels: Source Criticism and the New Literary Criticism (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 110; Leuven: University Press, 1993).
Fowler 1991
Robert M. Fowler, Let the Reader Understand: Reader-Response Criticism and the Gospel of Mark (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991).
Freedman 1992
David Noel Freedman, ed., The Anchor Bible Dictionary (New York: Doubleday, 1992).
Fuchs 1971
Albert Fuchs, Sprachliche Untersuchungen zu Matthäus und Lukas. Ein Beitrag zur Quellenkritik [Linguistic Examination of Matthew and Luke: A Contribution to Source Criticism] (AnBib, 49; Rome: 1971).
Fuchs 1978
Albert Fuchs, "Die Behandlung der mt/lk Übereinstimmungen gegen Mk durch S. McLoughlin und ihre Bedeutung für die Synoptische Frage" [The Treatment of the Matthean/Lukan Agreements against Mark in S. McLoughlin and their Significance for the Synoptic Question], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 3 (1978): 24-57.
Fuchs 1980a
Albert Fuchs, Die Entwicklung der Beelzebulkontroverse bei den Synoptikern. Traditionsgeschichtliche und redaktionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung von Mk 3,22-27 und Parallelen, verbunden mit der Rückfrage nach Jesus [The Development of the Beelzebul Controversy by the Synoptics: A Tradition and Redaction Criticial Examination of Mk 3:22-27 and Parallels, Combined with the Question to Jesus] (Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt, B5; Linz: 1980).
Fuchs 1980b
Albert Fuchs, "Die Überschneidungen von Mk und 'Q' nach B. H. Streeter und E. P. Sanders und ihre wahre Bedeutung (Mk 1,1-8 par.)" [The Overlaps of Mark and "Q" in B. H. Streeter and E. P. Sanders and their True Significance (Mk:1-18 ||)] in Wort in der Zeit (Haubek & Bachmann 1980: 28-81).
Fuchs 1981-82
Albert Fuchs, "Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studie zu Mk 1,29-31 par Mt 8,14-15 par Lk 4,38-39" [Study of the Developmental History of Mk 1:29-31 || Mt 8:14-15 || Lk 4:38-39], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 6/7 (1981-82): 21-76.
Fuchs 1983
"Durchbruch in der Synoptischen Frage. Bemerkungen zu einer neuen These und ihren Konsequenzen" [Breakthrough in the Synoptic Question: Comments on a New Thesis and its Consequences], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 8 (1983): 5-17.
Fuchs 1984
Albert Fuchs, "Versuchung Jesu" [Temptation of Jesus], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 9 (1984): 95-159.
Fuchs 1990a
Albert Fuchs, "Offene Probleme der Synoptikerforschung. Zur Geschichte der Perikope Mk 2,1-12 par Mt 9,1-8 par Lk 5,17-26" [Open Problem in Synoptic Research: On the History of the Pericope Mk 2:1-12 || Mt 9:1-8 || Lk 5:17-26], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 15 (1990): 73-99.
Fuchs 1990b, ST 1990, *1993
"Die 'Seesturmperikope' Mk 4,35-41 parr im Wandel der urchristlichen Verkündigung" [The 'Pericope of the Sea Storm' Mk 4:35-41 || throughout the early Christian Proclamation], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 15 (1990): 101-133. Spanish trans., "La pericopa de la "tempestad calmada" [Mc 4,35-41 par.] en el kerigma de la iglesia primitiva," Estudios bíblicos 48 [1990]: 433-460.
* Reprinted in Minor Agreements (Strecker 1993: 65-91).
Fuchs 1991
Albert Fuchs, "Die Last der Vergangenheit. Bemerkungen zu J. Kiilunen, Das Doppelgebot der Liebe in synoptischer Sicht. Ein redaktionskritischer Versuch über Mk 12,28-34 und die Parallelen" [The Burden of the Past: Comments on J. Kiilunen, The Double Commandment of Love from the Synoptics' Perspective: A Redaction Critical Test of Mk 12:28-34 and the Parallels], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 16 (1991): 151-168.
Fuchs 1992a
Albert Fuchs, "Schrittweises Wachstum. Zur Entwicklung der Perikope Mk 5,21-43 par Mt 9,18-26 par Lk 8,40-56" [Gradual Growth: On the Developement of the Pericope Mk 5:21-43 || Mt 9:18-26 || Lk 8:40-56], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 17 (1992): 5-53.
Fuchs 1992b
Albert Fuchs, "Aufwind für Deuteromarkus" [Impetus for Deutero-Mark], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt. Serie A 17 (1992): 55-76.
Fuchs 1992c
Albert Fuchs, "Die synoptische Aussendungsrede in quellenkritischer und traditionsgeschichtlicher Sicht" [The Synoptic Commissioning Saying from a Source and Tradition Critical Perspective], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 17 (1992): 77-168.
Fuchs 1993
"Das Elend mit der Zweiquellentheorie. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit zwei neueren Dissertationen zum Thema der minor agreements" [The Poverty of the Two Source Theory: An Analysis of Two New Dissertations on the Subject of the Minor Agreements], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 18 (1993): 183-243.
Fuchs 1994a
Albert Fuchs, "Die Sehnsucht nach der Vergangenheit" [The Longing for the Past], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 19 (1994): 69-111.
Fuchs 1994b
Albert Fuchs, "Die Sünde wider den Heiligen Geist. Mk 3,28-30 par Mt 12,31-37 par Lk 12,10" [The Sin against the Holy Spirit: Mk 3:28-30 || Mt 12:31-37 || Lk 12:10], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 19 (1994): 113 - 130.
Fuchs 1994c
Albert Fuchs, "Das Zeichen des Jona. Vom Rückfall" [The Sign of Jonah: For a Second Time], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 19 (1994): 131-60.
Fuchs 1994d
Albert Fuchs, "Bevormundung oder Die Arroganz der halben Wahrheit" [Patronizing or the Arrogance of the Half Truth], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 19 (1994): 161-172.
Fuchs 1995
Albert Fuchs, "Exegese im elfenbeinernen Turm. Das quellenkritische Problem von Mk 1,2-8 par Mt 3,1-12 par Lk 3,1-17 in der Sicht der Zweiquellentheorie und von Deuteromarkus" [Exegesis in the Ivory Tower: The Source Critical Problem of Mark 1:2-8 || Mt 3:1-12 || Lk 3:17 from the Perspective of the Two Source Theory and Deutero-Mark], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 20 (1995): 23-149.
Fuchs 1996
Albert Fuchs, "Zum Umfang von Q. Anfragen an eine neue Arbeit zur Logienquelle" [On the Extent of Q: Inquiry into a New Work on the Logia Source], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 21 (1996): 188-210.
Fuchs 1997
Albert Fuchs, "Die Agreement-Redaktion von Mk 6,32-44 par Mt 14,13-21 par Lk 9,10b-17. Ein vorläufiger Entwurf" [The Redaction-Agreement of Mk 6:32-44 || Mt 14:13-21 || Lk 9:10b-17: A Preliminary Sketch], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 22 (1997): 181-203.
Fuchs 1998
Albert Fuchs, "Die agreements der Einzugsperikope Mk 11,1-10 par Mt 21,1-9 par Lk 19,28-38" [The Agreements of the Pericope of the Triumphal Entry Mk 11:1-10 || Mt 21:1-9 || Lk 19:28-38], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 23 (1998): 215-227.
Fuchs 1999a
Albert Fuchs, "Die agreements der Perikope von der Taufe Jesu Mk 1,9-11 par Mt 3,13-17 par Lk 3,21-22" [The Agreements of the Pericope of the Baptism of Jesus Mk 1:9-11 || Mt 3:13-17 || Lk 3:21-22], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 24 (1999): 5-34.
Fuchs 1999b, ST 1999
Albert Fuchs, "Zweiquellentheorie oder Deuteromarkus?" [Two Source Theory or Deutero-Mark?], Bibel und Kirche 54 (1999): 63-69. Spanish trans. by G. Chico, "La Teoría de las dos fuentes o el Deutero-Marcos?" Anámnesis 9 (1999) 45-61.
Fuchs 2000a
Albert Fuchs, "Die Pharisäerfrage nach der Kaisersteuer Mk 12,13-17 par Mt 22,15-22 par Lk 20,20-26" [The Question of the Pharisees on Paying Tribute to Caesar], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 25 (2000).
Fuchs 2000b
Albert Fuchs, "Gethsemane: Die deuteromarkinische Bearbeitung von Mk 14,32-42 par Mt 26,36-46 par Lk 22,39-46" [Gethsemane: The Deutero-Markan Revision of Mk 14:32-42 || Mt 26:36-46 || Lk 22:39-46], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 25 (2000).
Fuller 1962
Reginald H. Fuller, The New Testament in Current Study (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1964).
Funk 1990, 3 1995
Robert W. Funk, ed., New Gospel Parallels, vol. 1,2 Mark (1st ed., 1990), Scholars Version Translation (3d. ed., Santa Rosa, Calif.: Polebridge Press, 1995).
Funk & Smith 1991
Robert W. Funk with Mahlon H. Smith, The Gospel of Mark: Red Letter Edition (Sonoma, Calif.: Polebridge Press, 1991).
Gaboury 1970
Antonio Gaboury, La Structure des Évangiles Synoptiques: La Structure-type à l'Origine des Synoptiques [The Structure of the Synoptic Gospels: The Structure-type at the Origin of the Synoptics] (Supplements to Novum Testamentum 22; Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1970).
Gerhardsson 1977, ET 1979
Birger Gerhardsson, Evangeliernas Förhistoria (Lund: Verbum-Håkan Ohlsson Forlag, 1977); English trans. The Origins of the Gospel Traditions (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979).
Gigot 1912
Francis E. Gigot, "Synoptics," in Catholic Encyclopedia 14 (Robert Appleton, 1912).
On-line version, ed. Douglas J. Potter.
Goodacre 1996
Mark S. Goodacre, Goulder and the Gospels: An Examination of a New Paradigm (Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 133; Sheffield: Academic Press, 1996).
Reviews by Robert Gundry, SBL Review of Biblical Literature (1998), Journal of Biblical Literature 117 (1998): 742-4, on-line version; Stephen Greenhalgh, Scripture Bulletin 28/1 (January 1998): 46-8; Allan J. McNicol, "Has Goulder Sunk Q?: An Assessment of Mark Goodacre’s Goulder and the Gospels: An Examination of a New Paradigm," read to the Synoptic Problem Seminar at SNTS Birmingham (August 1997), on-line version, PDF version; Frans Neirynck, "Goulder and the Minor Agreements," Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 73 (1997): 84-93; Christopher Tuckett, Journal of Theological Studies 49 (1998): 233-7.
Goodacre 1998
Mark Goodacre, "Fatigue in the Synoptics," New Testament Studies 44 (1998): 45-58.
On-line version, ed., idem at Mark without Q.
Goodacre 1999
Mark Goodacre, "Beyond the Q Impasse or down a Blind Alley?" Journal for the Study of the New Testament 76 (1999): 33-52.
Book review of Beyond the Q Impasse (McNicol et al. 1996).
Goodacre 2000
Mark Goodacre, "The Synoptic Jesus and the Celluloid Christ: Solving the Synoptic Problem Through Film," Journal for the Study of the New Testament 80 (2000): 31-43.
Goodspeed 1937
Edgar J. Goodspeed, An Introduction to the New Testament (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1937).
Goulder 1974
M. D. Goulder, Midrash and Lection in Matthew (London: 1974).
Goulder 1978
M. D. Goulder, "On Putting Q to the Test," New Testament Studies 24 (1978): 218-34.
Goulder 1984a
Michael Goulder, "Some Observations on Professor Farmer's 'Certain Results...'" in Synoptic Studies (Tuckett 1984b: 99-104).
Goulder 1984b
Michael Goulder, "The Order of a Crank" in Synoptic Studies (Tuckett 1984b: 111-130).
Goulder 1989
Michael D. Goulder, Luke: A New Paradigm (Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 20; Sheffield: Academic Press, 1989).
Goulder 1996
Michael D. Goulder, "Is Q a Juggernaut?" Journal of Biblical Literature 115 (1996): 667-81.
On-line version, ed., Mark Goodacre at Mark without Q.
Goulder 1999
Michael Goulder, "Self-Contradiction in the IQP," Journal of Biblical Literature 118 (1999): 518-26.
Grant 1963
Robert M. Grant, A Historical Introduction to the New Testament (New York: Harper & Row, 1963).
Green et al. 1992
Joel B. Green, Scot McKnight, I. Howard Marshall, eds., Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels: A Compendium of Contemporary Biblical Scholarship (Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity, 1992).
Greeven 1978
Heinrich Greeven, English translation by Robert Althann, S.J., "The Gospel Synopsis from 1776 to the Present Day" in J. J. Griesbach (Orchard & Longstaff 1978: 22-49).
Greeven 1981
Albert Huck, Synopse der drei ersten Evangelien mit Beigage der johanneischen Parallelstellen; Synopsis of the First Three Gospels with the addition of the Johannine Parallels, 13. Auflage, völlig neu bearbeitet von, 13th edition, fundamentally revised by Heinrich Greeven (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1981).
Griesbach 1789-90, 2 1794, * 1978, * ET 1978
Johan Jakob Griesbach, Commentatio qua Marci Evangelium totum e Matthaei et Lucae commentariis decerptum esse monstratur [A dissertation in which the whole Gospel of Mark is shown to be derived from the memoirs of Matthew and Luke], I-II (Jena, 1789-90), enlarged ed., in J. C. Velsthusen et al., eds., Commentationes theologicae, vol. I (Leipzig, 1794): 360-434; reprinted in Griesbach, Opsuscula academica, J. Ph. Gabler, ed., vol. II (Jena, 1825) 358-425.
* Reprinted in J. J. Griesbach (Orchard & Longstaff 1978: 74-102); English trans. by Bernard Orchard, "A Demonstration that Mark was Written after Matthew and Luke" in J. J. Griesbach (Orchard & Longstaff 1978: 103-135).
Grotius 1641
Hugo Grotius, Annotationes in libros evangeliorum [Notes on the books of the gospels] (Amsterdam, 1641).
Gundry 1967
Robert Horton Gundry, The Use of the Old Testament in St. Matthew's Gospel: With Special Reference to the Messianic Hope (Supplements to Novum Testamentum 18; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1967).
Gundry 1982, 2 1994
Robert H. Gundry, Matthew: A Commentary on His Handbook for a Mixed Church under Persecution (1st ed., 1982; 2d ed., Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1994).
Gundry 1993
Robert H. Gundry, Mark: A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eermans, 1993).
Guthrie 1965, 3 1970
Donald Guthrie, New Testament Introduction (1965; 3d ed., Downers Grove, Ill.: Inter-varsity, 1970).
Guy 1954
Harold A. Guy, The Origin of the Gospel of Mark (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1954).
Harnack 1907
Adolf Harnack, Sprüche und Reden Jesu: die zweite Quelle des Matthäus und Lukas [Sayings and Speeches of Jesus: The Second Source of Matthew and Luke] (Beiträge zur Einleitung in das neue Testament; Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1907).
Haubek & Bachmann 1980
Wilfrid Haubeck & Michael Bachmann, eds., Wort in der Zeit. Neutestamentliche Studien. Festgabe für Karl Heinrich Rengstorf zum 75. Geburtstag [Word in the Times: New Testament Studies. Festscrift for Karl Heinrich Rengstorf on his 75th Birthday] (Leiden: Brill, 1980).
Hawkins 1899, 21909
Sir John C. Hawkins, Horae Synopticae: Contributions to the Study of the Synoptic Problem (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1899; 2d ed., revised and supplemented,1909).
On-line summary, Stephen C. Carlson at Synoptic Problem.
Head 1997
Peter M. Head, Christology and the Synoptic Problem: An Argument for Markan Priority (Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 94; Cambridge: University Press, 1997).
Hengel 1985
Martin Hengel, Studies in the Gospel of Mark, articles translated from the German by John Bowden (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1985).
Herder 1797, *1880
Johann Gottfried Herder, Christliche Schriften [Christian Writings] (3 vols.; Riga, 1797), * also in Collected Works, ed. B. Suphan, (1880) 19:135ff., 253ff.
Hobbs 1980
Edward C. Hobbs, "A Quarter-Century Without 'Q'", Perkins Journal (Summer 1980): 10-19.
On-line version, ed., Mark Goodacre at Mark without Q.
Hoffman et al. 1999
Paul Hoffman, Thomas Hieke & Ulrich Bauer, Synoptic Concordance: A Greek Concordance to the First Three Gospels in Synoptic Arrangement, statistically evaluated, including occurrences in Acts (Berlin: de Gruyter, vol. 1, Introduction, A-D, 1999).
Holtzmann 1863
Heinrich Julius Holtzmann, Die Synoptischen Evangelien: Ihr Ursprung und ihr geschichtlicher Charakter [The Synoptic Gospels: Their Origin and their Historical Character], (Leipzig, 1863).
Holtzmann 1885
Heinrich Julius Holtzmann, Lehrbuch der historisch-kritischen Einleitung in das neue Testament [Textbook of the Historical-Critical Introduction to the New Testament] (Sammlung theologischer Lehrbücher; Freiburg i. B.: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1885).
Holtzmann 1901
H. J. Holtzmann, Die Synoptiker (eds. H. J. Holtzman, R. A Lipsius, P. W. Schimiedel, and H. von Soden; Hand-Commentar zum neuen Testament; 3d ed.; Tübingen/Leipzig: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1901).
Honoré 1968, * 1999
A. M. Honoré, "A Statistical Study of the Synoptic Problem," Novum Testamentum 10 (1968): 95-147.
* Reprinted in The Synoptic Problem and Q (Orton 1999: 70-122).
Hooker 1991
Morna D. Hooker, The Gospel According to Saint Mark (Black's New Testament Commentaries II; London: A & C Black, 1991).
Howard 1995
George Howard, Hebrew Gospel of Matthew (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, rev. ed., 1995).
Huck 1892, 7 1928
Albert Huck, Synopse er Drei Ersten Evangelien: anhang: die Johannesparallelen [Synopsis of the Three First Gospels: Appendix: the Johannine parallels] (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1892; 7th ed., 1928).
Huggins 1992, * 1999
Ronald V. Huggins, "Matthean Posteriority: A Preliminary Proposal," Novum Testamentum 34 (1992): 1-22.
* Reprinted in The Synoptic Problem and Q (Orton 1999: 204-25).
Jacobson 1982
Arland D. Jacobson, "The Literary Unity of Q," Journal of Biblical Literature 101 (1982): 365-89.
Jameson 1922
H. G. Jameson, The Origin of the Synoptic Gospels: A Revision of the Synoptic Problem (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1922).
Jeremias 8 1970, ET 1972
Joachim Jeremias, Die Gleinisse Jesu, (8th ed., Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1970), The Parables of Jesus (trans. S. H. Hooke; New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1972).
Johnson, L.T. 1986
Luke Timothy Johnson, The Writings of the New Testament: An Interpretation (Philadelphia, Fortress, 1986).
Johnson, S. 1991
Sherman E. Johnson, The Griesbach Hypothesis and Redaction Criticism (The Society of Biblical Literature Monograph Series 41; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1991).
Jülicher 1894, 2 1900, ET1904
Adolf Jülicher (1894; 2d ed. 1900); English trans. by James Penrose Ward with a prefatory note by Mrs. Humphry Ward, An Introduction to the New Testament (New York: G.P. Putman's Sons, 1904)
Kee 1977, * 1983
Howard Clark Kee, Community of the New Age: Studies in Mark's Gospel (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1997; repr. with corr., Macon, Ga.: Mercer Univ., 1983).
Kee et al. 1957, 3 1973
Howard Clark Kee, Franklin W. Young & Karlfried Froehlich, Understanding the New Testament (1st ed. 1957; 3d ed.; Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973).
Kilpatrick 1946
G. D. Kilpatrick, The Origins of the Gospel According to St. Matthew (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946).
Kloppenborg 1987
John S. Kloppenborg, The Formation of Q: Trajectories in Ancient Wisdom Collections (Studies in Antiquity & Christianity; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987)
On-line summary, William Arnal. On-line summary, Stephen C. Carlson at Synoptic Problem.
Kloppenborg 1988
John S. Kloppenborg, Q Parallels: Synopsis, Critical Notes, & Concordance (Sonoma, Calif.: Polebridge, 1988).
Kloppenborg 1992
John S. Kloppenborg, "The Theological Stakes in the Synoptic Problem" in The Four Gospels 1992 (Van Segbroeck et al. 1992: 1:93-120).
Kloppenborg 1994
John S. Kloppenborg, ed., The Shape of Q: Signal Essays on the Sayings Gospel (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1994).
Kloppenborg 1995
John S. Kloppenborg, ed., Conflict and Invention: Literary, Rhetorical, and Social Studies on the Sayings Gospel Q (Valley Forge, Pa.: Trinity Press Int'l, 1995).
Kloppenborg Verbin 2000
John S. Kloppenborg Verbin, Excavating Q: The History and Setting of the Sayings Gospel (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2000).
Kloppenborg et al. 1990
John S. Kloppenborg, Marvin W. Meyer, Stephen J. Patterson & Michael G. Seinhauser, Q--Thomas Reader (Sonoma, Calif.: Polebridge, 1990).
Kloppenborg & Vaage 1992
John S. Kloppenborg & Leif E. Vaage, guest eds., Early Christianity, Q and Jesus (Semeia: An Experimental Journal for Biblical Criticism 55; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1992).
Koester 1983
Helmut Koester, "History and Development of Mark's Gospel (From Mark to Secret Mark and 'Canonical Mark')" in Colloquy on New Testament Studies (Corley 1983: 35-57).
Koester 1990
Helmut Koester, Ancient Christian Gospels: Their History and Development (Philaelphia: Trinity Press Int'l, 1990).
Kogler 1988
Franz Kogler, Das Doppelgleichnis vom Senfkorn und vom Sauerteig in seiner traditionsgeschichtlichen Entwicklung. Zur Reich-Gottes-Vorstellun [The Double Parable of the Mustard Seed and the Leaven in their Tradition Critical Development] (Forschung zur Bibel 59; Würzburg: Echter-Verlag, 1988).
Koppe 1782, 2 1789
Johann Benjamin Koppe, Marcus non Epitomator Matthaei [Mark is not the abbreviator of Matthew] (Göttingen, 1782; 2d ed. 1789).
Kümmel 1958, 2 1970, ET 1972
Werner Georg Kümmel, Das Neue Testament: Gesechichte der Erforschung seiner Probleme (1958; 2d ed., 1970), English trans. by S. McLean Gilmour & Howard C. Kee, The New Testament: The History of the Investigation of its Problems (Nashville: Abington, 1972).
Kümmel 14 1965, ET 1966
Werner Georg Kümmel, Einleitung in das Neue Testament, founded by Paul Feine & Johannes Behm (14th rev. ed., 1965), English trans. by A. J. Mattill, Jr., Introduction to the New Testament (Nashville: Abingdon, 1966).
Kümmel 17 1973, ET 1975, * 1985
Werner Georg Kümmel, Einleitung in das Neue Testament (17th rev. ed., 1973), English trans. by Howard Clark Kee, Introduction to the New Testament (Nashville: Abingdon, 1975).
* Pages 56-63 (1973) reprinted as "In Support of Markan Priority" in Two-Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 53-62).
* Pages 63-67 (1973) reprinted as "In Support of Q" in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 227-43).
Lachmann 1835, ET 1966-67, *ET1985
Karl Lachmann, "De ordine narrationum in evangeliis synopticis" in Theologische Studien und Kritiken (1835): 570-90; pp. 573-84; English trans. by N. H. Palmer, "Lachmann's Argument" (Palmer 1966-67: 368-78).
* English trans. reprinted in Two-Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 123-31).
Lambrecht 1992
J. Lambrecht, "John the Baptist and Jesus in Mark 1.1-15: Markan Redaction of Q?" New Testament Studies 38 (1992): 357-84.
LeClerc 1716
Jean LeClerc (Joannes Clericus), Historia Ecclesiastica [Ecclesiastical History] (Amsterdam, 1716).
Lessing 1778, * 1886-1924, ET 1956
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, "Neue Hypothese über die Evangelisten als bloss menschliche Geschichtesschreiber betracht" (1778 unpub.) in Theologischer Nachlass (Berlin, 1784): 42-75; repr. in Lachmann & Muncker, eds., Lessings Werke (1886-1924) 16:370-91; English trans. by Henry Chadwick, "New Hypothesis Concerning the Evangelists Regarded as Merely Human Historians" in Lessing's Theological Writings (Stanford: University Press, 1956): 65-81.
Lindsey 1963, * 1999
R. L. Lindsey, "A Modified Two-Document Theory of the Synoptic Dependence and Independence," Novum Testamentum 6 (1963): 239-63.
* Reprinted in Synoptic Problem and Q (Orton 1999: 7-31).
Lindsey 2 1973
Robert Lisle Lindsey, A Hebrew Translation of the Gospel of Mark: Greek-Hebrew Diglot with English Introduction, forward by David Flusser (Jerusalem: Dugith, 2d ed., 1973).
Lindsey 1985, 1988, 1989
Robert Lisle Lindsey, ed., Elmar Camillo Dos Santos, collator and compiler, A Comparative Greek Concordance of the Synoptic Gospels, vol. 1, A-I, (Jerusalem: Dugith, 1985); vol. 2, I-O, Robert Lisle Lindsey & James Leonard Burnham, eds., Elmar Camillo Dos Santos, collator and compiler (1988); vol. 3, O-W, Robert Lisle Lindsey, ed., James Leonard Burnham, collator and compiler (1989).
Linnemann 1992, ET 1992
Eta Linnemann, Gibt es ein synoptisches Problem?, English trans. by Robert W. Yarbrough, Is There a Synoptic Problem: Rethinking the Literary Dependence of the First Three Gospels (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 1992).
Lockton 1922
W. Lockton, "The Origin of the Gospels," Church Quarterly Review (July, 1922).
Lockton 1927
W. Lockton, Certain Alleged Gospel Sources: A study of Q, Proto Luke and M (London: Longmans, Green, 1927).
Loisy ET 1962
Alfred Firmin Loisy, The Birth of the Christian Religion & The Origins of the New Testatment; English trans. by L. P. Jacks (New Hyde Park, N.Y.: University Books, 1962).
Longstaff 1977
Thomas R. W. Longstaff, Evidence of Conflation in Mark? A Study in the Synoptic Problem (SBL Dissertation Series 26; Missoula, Mont.: Scholar's, 1977).
Longstaff & Page 1988
Thomas Richmond Willis Longstaff & Page A. Thomas, The Synoptic Problem: A Bibliography 1716-1988 (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1988).
Lührmann 1989
Dieter Lührmann, "The Gospel of Mark and the Sayings Collection Q," Journal of Biblical Literature 108 (1989): 51-71.
Lummis 1915
E. W. Lummis, How Luke Was Written (Consideration affecting the Two-document Theory with special reference to the Phenomena of Order in the Non-Marcan Matter common to Matthew and Luke) (Cambridge: 1915).
MacDonald 2000
Dennis R. MacDonald, The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000).
Mack 1992
Burton L. Mack, "Q and the Gospel of Mark: Revising Christian Origins" in Semeia 55 (Kloppenborg & Vaage 1992: 15-39).
Mack 1993
Burton L. Mack, The Lost Gospel: The Book of Q & Christian Origins (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1993).
Mack 1995
Burton L. Mack, Who Wrote the New Testament? The Making of the Christian Myth (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1995).
Marsh 1802
Herbert Marsh, "Dissertation on the Origin of our Three First Canonical Gospels" in Introduction to the New Testament by John David Michaelis, vol. 3, pt. 2 (2d ed., London: F. & C. Rivington, 1802) 167-409.
Marxsen 1956, 2 1959, ET 1969
Willi Marxsen, Der Evangelist Markus (1956; 2d ed. 1959); English trans. by James Boyce et al., Mark the Evangelist: Studies on the Redaction History of the Gospel (Nashville: Abington Press, 1969).
Marxsen 3 1964, ET 1968
W. Marxsen, Einleitung in das neue Testament (Gütersloh, Germany: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn, 1964); English trans. by G. Buswell, Introduction to the New Testament: An Approach to its Problems (Basil Blackwell: Oxford, 1968).
Massaux 1950, ET1990
Édouard Massaux, Influence de l'Évangile de saint Matthieu sur la littérature chrétienne avant saint Irénée (1950), English trans. by Norman J. Belval & Suzanne Hecht, edited with an introduction and addenda by Arthur J. Bellinzoni, Influence of the Gospel of Saint Matthew on Christian Literature before Saint Irenaeus (New Gospel Studies 5; Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1990) 3 vols.
Mattila 1994, * 1999
Sharon L. Mattila, "A Problem Still Clouded: Yet Again -- Statistics and 'Q'," Novum Testamentum 37 (1994): 105-29.
* Reprinted in Synoptic Problem and Q (Orton 1999: 226-42).
Mattila 1995
Sharon Lea Mattila, "A Question Too Often Neglected," New Testament Studies 41 (1995): 199-217.
McCoy 1913
Rollin Delos McCoy, The Two-Document Hypothesis in Relation to the Synoptic Problem (M.A. diss.; Univ. Chicago, 1913).
McLean 1995
Bradley H. McLean, "On the Gospel of Thomas and Q" in (Piper 1995: 321-45).
McNeile 1924, 2 1953
A. H. McNeile, An Introduction to the Study of the New Testament (1924), 2d ed. rev'd. by C. S. C. Williams (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953).
McNicol et al. 1996
Allan J. McNicol, ed., with David L. Dungan & David B. Peabody, Beyond the Q Impasse--Luke's Use of Matthew: A Demonstration by the Research Team of the International Institute for Gospel Studies (Valley Forge, Pa.: Trinity Press Int'l, 1996).
Reviewed by (Goodacre 1999).
Menzies 1901
Allan Menzies, The Earliest Gospel: A Historical Study of the Gospel According to Mark, with a text and English version (London: Macmillan, 1901).
Metzger 1971, 2 1994
Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, A Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament (1971; 2d ed., Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1994).
Metzger 1991
Bruce M. Metzger, "Introduction to the New Testament" in Bruce M. Metzger & Roland E. Murphy, eds., The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Appcryphal / Deuterocanonical Books (New Revised Standard Version; New York: Oxford University Press, 1991) NT:iii-vi.
Michaelis 3 1777, 4 1778
Johann David Michaelis, Einleitung in die göttlichen Scriften den Neuen Bundes (Göttingen, 3d ed., 1777; 4th ed., 1788); English trans. by Herbert Marsh, Introduction (Marsh 1801).
Miller 1992
Robert J. Miller, ed., The Complete Gospels: Annotated Scholars Version (Sonoma, Calif.: Polebridge, rev. and expanded ed., 1992).
Moule 1962
C. F. D. Moule, The Birth of the New Testament (Harper & Row, 1962).
Neirynck 1974
Frans Neirynck, in collaboration with Theo Hanson & Frans Van Segbroeck, The Minor Agreements of Matthew and Luke Against Mark with a Cumulative List (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 37; Leuven: University Press, 1974).
Neirynck 1976, * 1985
F. Neirynck, "Synoptic Problem" in The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible (Nashville: Abington, 1976) Supp: 845-48.
* Reprinted as "The Synoptic Problem" in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 85-93).
Neirynck 1979
Frans Neirynck, avec la collaboration de Joël Delobel, Thierry Snoy, Gilbert Van Belle & Frans Van Segbroeck, Jean et les Synoptiques: Examen critique de l'exégèse de M.-É. Boismard [John and the Synoptics: Critical Examination of the Exegesis of M.-É. Boismard] (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 49; Leuven: University Press, 1979).
Neirynck 1990a
Frans Neirynck, "Synoptic Problem" in New Jerome Biblical Commentary (Brown et al. 1990: 587-95).
Neirynck 1990b
Frans Neirynck, "Introduction: The Two-Source Hypothesis" in Interrelations of the Gospels (Dungan 1990a: 3-22).
Neirynck 1991
Frans Neirynck, Evangelica II: 1982-1991 Collected Essays, ed. by F. Van Segbroeck (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 99; Leuven: University Press, 1991).
Neirynck 1995
Frans Neirynck, "The Minor Agreements and Q" in Gospel Behind the Gospels (Piper 1995: 49-72).
Neirynck & Verheyden 1998
F. Neirynck & J. Verhayden, The Gospel of Matthew and the Sayings Source Q: A Cumulative Bibliography 1950-1995 (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 105; Leuven: University Press, 1998) 2 vols.
Neusner 1975
Jacob Neusner, ed., Christianity, Judaism, and Other Greco-Roman Cults: Studies for Morton Smith at Sixty, Part One: New Testament (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1975).
Neville 1994
David J. Neville, Arguments from Order in Synoptic Source Criticism: A History and Critique (New Gospel Studies 7; Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1994).
New 1993
David S. New, Old Testament Quotations in the Synoptic Gospels, and the Two-Document Hypothesis (Septuagint and Cognate Studies 97; Atlanta, Ga.: Scholar's, 1993).
Niemand 1989a
Christoph Niemand, "Bemerkungen zur literarkritischen Relevanz der minor agreements. Überlegungen zu einigen Aufgaben und Problemen der agreement-Forschung" [Comments on the Literary Critical Relevance of the Minor Agreements: Observations on Some Questions and Problems of the Study of Agreements], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 14 (1989): 25-38.
Niemand 1989b
Christoph Niemand, Studien zu den Minor Agreements der synoptischen Verklärungsperikopen. Eine Untersuchung der literarkritischen Relevanz der gemeinsamen Abweichungen des Matthäus und Lukas von Markus 9,2-10 für die synoptische Frage [Studies on the Minor Agreements of the Synoptic Transfiguration Pericope: An Examination of the Literary Critical Relevance of the Common Differences of Matthew and Luke from Mark 9:2-10 for the Synoptic Question] (Europäische Hochschulschriften. XXIII/352; Frankfurt: P. Lang, 1989).
Niemand 1993
Christoph Niemand, "Die Täuferlogien Mk 1,7-8 parr. Traditions- und redaktionsgeschichtliche Überlegungen und ihre Bedeutung für die synoptische Frage" [The Baptism Sayings Mk1:7-8 || Tradition- and Redaction-Critical Observations and their Significance for the Synoptic Question], Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt 18 (1993): 63 - 96.
Nineham 1955
D. E. Nineham, ed., Studies in the Gospels: Essays in Memory of R. H. Lightfoot (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1955).
Nickle 1980
Keith F. Nickle, The Synoptic Gospels: Conflict and Consensus (Atlanta: John Knox, 1980).
Orchard 1976
Bernard Orchard, Matthew, Luke & Mark (Manchester: Koinonia, 1976).
Orchard 1978
Bernard Orchard, "A Demonstration that Mark was Written after Matthew and Luke (A translation of J. J. Griesbach's Commentatio qua Marci Evangelium toto e Matthaei et Lucae commentariis decerptum esse monstratur)" in J. J. Griesbach (Orchard & Longstaff 1978: 103-135).
Orchard 1983
John Bernard Orchard, A Synopsis of the Four Gospels: In Greek, Arranged According to the Two-Gospel Hypothesis (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1983).
Orchard & Longstaff 1978
Bernard Orchard & Thomas R. W. Longstaff, eds., J. J. Griesbach: Synoptic and Text-Critical Studies 1776-1976 (Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 34; Cambridge: University Press, 1978).
Orchard & Riley 1987
Bernard Orchard & Harold Riley, The Order of the Synoptics: Why Three Synoptic Gospels? (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1987).
Orton 1999
David E. Orton, ed., The Synoptic Problem and Q: Selected Studies from Novum Testamentum (Brill's Readers in Biblical Studies 4; Leiden: Brill, 1999).
Overman 1990
J. Andrew Overman, Matthew's Gospel and Formative Judaism: The Social World of the Matthean Community (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990).
Owen 1764
Henry Owen, Observations on the Four Gospels (London: 1764).
Palmer 1966-67, * 1985
N. H. Palmer, "Lachmann's Argument," New Testament Studies 13 (1966-67): 368-378.
* Reprinted in Two-Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 119-131).
Palmer 1968
Humphrey Palmer, The Logic of Gospel Criticism: An account of the methods and arguments used by textual, documentary, source, and form critics of the New Testament (London: Macmillan, 1968).
Parker, D. 1997
D. C. Parker, The Living Text of the Gospels (Cambridge: University Press, 1997).
Parker, P. 1953
Pierson Parker, The Gospel Before Mark (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953).
Parker, P. 1980, * 1985
Pierson Parker, "A Second Look at The Gospel Before Mark," Journal of Biblical Literature 100 (1980): 389-413
* Pages 395-405 reprinted as "The Second Gospel is Secondary" in The Two-Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 205-17).
Parker, P.1983
Pierson Parker, "The Posteriority of Mark" in New Synoptic Studies (Farmer 1983a: 65-142)
Patterson 1993
Stephen J. Patterson, The Gospel of Thomas and Jesus (Sonoma, Calif.: Polebridge, 1993).
Patton 1915
Carl S. Patton, Sources of the Synoptic Gospels (U. of Mich. Studies, Humanistic Series 5; New York: Macmillan, 1915).
Patzia 1995
Arthur G. Patzia, The Making of the New Testament: Origin, Collection, Text & Canon (Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity, 1995).
Peabody 1983a
David Barrett Peabody, The Redactional Features of the Author of Mark: A Method Focusing on Recurrent Phraseology and its Application (Ph. D. dissertation; Southern Methodist University, May 5, 1983).
Peabody 1983b
David Peabody, "Augustine and the Augustinian Hypothesis: A Reexamination of Augustine's Thought in De consensu evangelistarum" in New Synoptic Studies (Farmer 1983a: 37-64).
Peabody 1983c
David Peabody, "The Late Secondary Redaction of Mark's Gospel and the Griesbach Hypothesis: A Response to Helmut Koester" in Colloquy on New Testament Studies (Corley 1983: 87-132).
Peabody 1987
David Barrett Peabody, Mark as Composer (New Gospel Studies 1; Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1987).
Peake 1910
Arthur S. Peake, A Critical Introduction to the New Testament (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1910).
Peake 1929
Arthur S. Peake with the assistance for the New Testament of A. J. Grieve, A Commentary on the Bible (London: T.C. & E.C. Jack, 1929).
Perrin & Duling 1974, 2 1982
Norman Perrin & Dennis C. Duling, The New Testament: An Introduction, Proclamation and Parenesis, Myth and History (1974; 2d ed., San Diego: Harcourt Brace & Jovanovich, 1982).
Petrie 1959, * 1999
Stewart Petrie, "'Q' is Only What You Mark It," Novum Testamentum 3 (1959): 28-33.
* Reprinted in Synoptic Problem and Q (Orton 1999: 1-6).
Piper 1995
Ronald A. Piper, ed., The Gospel Behind the Gospels: Current Studies on Q (Supplements to the Novum Testamentum 75; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995).
Powell 1994
Evan Powell, The Unfinished Gospel: Notes on the Quest for the Historical Jesus (Westlake Village, Calif.: Symposium Books, 1994).
Rauscher 1990
J. Rauscher, Vom Messiasgeheimnis zur Lehre der Kirche. Die Entwicklung der sogenannten Parabeltheorie in der synoptischen Tradition (Mk 4,10-12 par Mt 13,10-17 par Lk 8,9-10) [On the Messianic Secret for the Teaching of the Church: The Development of the So-Called Parable Theory in the Synoptic Tradition (Mk 4:10-12 || Mt 13:10-17 || Lk 8:9-10] (diss.; Linz: 1990).
Rauscher 1994
J. Rauscher, Das Bildwort von der Öllampe in der synoptischen Tradition. Eine Auslegung von Mk 4,21f par Lk 8,16f; Mt 5,15; Lk 11,33 [The Image of the Oil Lamp in Synoptic Tradition: An Interpretation of Mk 4:21f || Lk 8:16f; Mt 5:15; Lk 11:33] (Desselbrunn: 1994).
Reicke 1978a
Bo Reicke, "Griesbach's Answer to the Synoptic Question," English trans. by Ronald Wells, in J. J. Griesbach (Orchard & Longstaff 1978: 50-67, 198-200).
Reicke 1978b
Bo Reicke, "Introduction (to Griesbach's Commentatio)" in J. J. Griesbach (Orchard & Longstaff 1978: 68-73).
Reicke 1986
Bo Reicke, The Roots of the Synoptic Gospels (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1986).
Reicke 1990
Bo Reike, "The History of the Synoptic Discussion", in Interrelations of the Gospels (Dungan 1990a: 291-316).
Riley 1989
Harold Riley, The Making of Mark: An Exploration (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1989).
Riley 1992
Harold Riley, The First Gospel (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1992).
Riley 1993
Harold Riley, Preface to Luke (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1993).
Rist 1978
John M. Rist, On the Independence of Matthew and Mark (Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 32; Cambridge: University Press, 1978).
Robinson 1976
John A. T. Robinson, Redating the New Testament (London: SCM, 1976).
Robinson et al. 2000
James M. Robinson, Paul Hoffmann, John S, Kloppenborg, eds., Milton C. Moreland, managing ed., The Critical Edition of Q: Synopsis including the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, Mark and Thomas with English, German, and French Translations of Q and Thomas (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress; Leuven: Peeters, 2000).
Rosché 1960, * 1985
T. R. Rosché, "The Words of Jesus and the Future of the 'Q' Hypothesis," Journal of Biblical Literature 79 (1960): 210-20.
* Reprinted in Two-Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 357-69).
Ropes 1934, 2 1960
James Hardy Ropes, The Synoptic Gospels (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1934) with a new preface by D. E. Nineham (London: Oxford University Press, 2d impression, 1960).
On-line quotations, ed. Mark Goodacre at Mark without Q.
Rushbrooke 1880
W. G. Rushbrooke, Synopticon: An Exposition of the Common Matter of the Synoptic Gospels (London: Macmillan: 1880).
Sabbe 1974
M. Sabbe, L'Évangile selon Marc: Tradition et Rédaction [The Gospel According to Mark: Tradition and Redaction] (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 34; Leuven: University Press, 1974).
Sanday 1911
W. Sanday, ed., Studies in the Synoptic Problem, by members of the University of Oxford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911), herein Oxford Studies.
Sanders 1968-69, * 1985
E. P. Sanders, "The Argument from Order and the Relationship Between Matthew and Like," New Testament Studies 15 (1968-69): 249-61.
* Reprinted in Two-Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 409-25).
Sanders 1969, * 1985
E. P. Sanders, The Tendencies of the Synoptic Tradition (Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 9; Cambridge: University Press, 1969).
* Pages 290-93 reprinted as "Suggested Exceptions to the Priority of Mark" in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 199-203).
Sanders 1972-73
E. P. Sanders, "The Overlaps of Mark and Q and the Synoptic Problem," New Testament Studies 19 (1972-73): 453-65.
Sanders 1985
E. P. Sanders, Jesus and Judaism (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985).
Sanders & Davies 1989
E. P. Sanders & Margaret Davies, Studying the Synoptic Gospels (London: SCM, 1989).
Schleiermacher 1832
Friedrich Ernst Daniel Schleiermacher, "Über die Zeugnisse des Papias von unsern beiden ersten Evangelien" [On the Witness of Papias for Both Our First Gospels] in Theologische Studien und Kritiken (1832).
Schnelle 1994, ET 1998
Udo Schnelle, Einleitung in das neue Testament (Uni-Taschenbücher 1830; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1994), The History and Theology of the New Testament Writings (trans. M. Eugene Boring; Minneapolis: Fortress, 1998).
Shuler 1982
Philip L. Shuler, A Genre for the Gospels: The Biographical Character of Matthew (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982).
Simons 1880
Eduard Simons, Hat der dritte Evangelist den kanonishen Mattäus benutzt? [Did the Third Evangelist Use the Canonical Matthew?] (Bonn: Universitäts-Buchdruckerei von Carl Georgi, 1880).
Smith 1922
Robinson Smith, The Solution of the Synoptic Problem: Sources, Sequences and Dates of the Gospels and Epistles, and the Consequent Life of Christ (London: Watts & Co., 1922).
Solages ET1959
Mgr de Solages, A Greek Synopsis of the Gospels: A New Way of Solving the Synoptic Problem; English trans. by J. Baissus (Leyden: E. J. Brill, 1959).
Stanton 1989
Graham N. Stanton, The Gospels and Jesus (The Oxford Bible Series; Oxford: University Press, 1989).
Stanton 1992
Graham N. Stanton, A Gospel for a New People: Studies in Matthew (Louisville, Ky.: Westminster/John Knox, 1992).
Stein 1987
Robert H. Stein, The Synoptic Problem: An Introduction (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 1987).
Stein 1991
Robert H. Stein, Gospels and Tradition: Studies on Redaction Criticism of the Synoptic Gospels (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 1991).
Stein 1992a
R. H. Stein, "Synoptic Problem" in Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels (Green et al. 1992: 784-92)
Stein 1992b
Robert H. Stein, "The Matthew-Luke Agreements Against Mark: Insight from John," Catholic biblical quarterly 54 (1992): 482 - 502.
Stoldt 1977, ET 1980
Hans-Herbert Stoldt, Geschichte und Kritik der Marcushypothese (1977), English trans. by Donald L. Niewyk, History and Criticism of the Markan Hypothesis (Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 1980).
Stonehouse 1963, * 1979
Ned B. Stonehouse, Origins of the Synoptic Gospels: Some Basic Questions (Eerdmans, 1963).
* Reprinted with foreword by William L. Lane (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House, 1979).
Storr 1786
Gottlob Christian Storr, Über den Zweck der evangelischen Geschichte und der Briefe Johannis [On the Purpose of the Gospel History and the Johannine Epistles] (Tübingen: 1786).
Storr 1790
Gottlob Christian Storr, In Librorum N. T. historicorum aliquot loca [On Some Passages of the Historical Books of the N.T.] (Tübingen: 1790).
Strecker 1993
Georg Strecker, ed., Minor Agreements. Symposium Göttingen 1991 (Göttinger theologische Arbeiten 50; Göttingen-Zürich: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1993).
Strecker & Schnelle 1994
Georg Strecker & Udo Schnelle, Einführung in die neutestamentliche Exegese [Introduction to New Testament Exegesis] (Uni-Taschenbücher 1253; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1994).
Streeter 1911
B. H. Streeter, "St. Mark's Knowledge and Use of Q" in Oxford Studies (Sanday 1911: 165-83).
Streeter 1924, * 1985
Burnett Hillman Streeter, The Four Gospels: A Study of Origins, treating of the manuscript tradition, sources, authorship, & dates (London: Macmillan, 1924).
* Pages 157-69, 195-97 reprinted as "The Priority of Mark" in Two-Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 23-36).
* Pages 182-86 reprinted as "The Document Q" in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 221-25).
Streeter 1929
B. H. Streeter, "The Synoptic Problem" in Peake's Commentary (Peake 1929): 672-80.
Styler 1962, * 1985
G. M. Styler, "The Priority of Mark" in The Birth of the New Testament (Moule 1962: 223-32).
* Reprinted in Two-Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 63-75).
Simpson 1965-66, * 1985
R. T. Simpson, "The Major Agreements of Matthew and Luke Against Mark," New Testament Studies 12 (1965-66): 273-84.
* Reprinted in Two Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 381-95).
Swanson 1975, 2 1984
Reuben J. Swanson, The Horizontal Line Synopsis of the Gospels (1975; 2d ed., Pasadena, Calif.: William Carey Library, 1984)
Swanson 1982
Reuben J. Swanson, The Horizontal Line Synopsis of the Gospels (Greek Edition) Volume I. The Gospel of Matthew (Dillsboro, N.C.: Western N. Carolina, 1982).
Taylor 1933, 2 1935
Vincent Taylor, The Formation of the Gospel Tradition: Eight Lectures (1933; 2d ed., London: Macmillan, 1935).
Taylor 1952
Vincent Taylor, The Gospel According to St. Mark: The Greek Text with Introduction, Notes and Indexes (London: Macmillan, 1952).
Tevis 1982
Dennis Gordon Tevis, An Analysis of Words and Phrases Characteristic of the Gospel of Matthew (Ph. D. dissertation; Southern Methodist University, December 4, 1982).
Theron 1957
Daniel J. Theron, Evidence of Tradition: Selected Source Material for the Study of the History of the Early Church Introduction and Canon of the New Testament (London: Bowes & Bowes, 1957).
Throckmorton 1949, 4 1979, 5 1992
Burton H. Throckmorton, Jr., ed., Gospel Parallels: A Comparison of the Synoptic Gospels, with Alternative Readings from the Manuscripts and Noncanonical Parallels (1949; Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 4th ed., 1978; 5th ed., 1992).
Trocmé 1963, ET 1975
Étienne Trocmé, La formation de l'Évangile selon Marc (Paris: 1963); English trans. by Pamela Gaughan, The Formation of the Gospel According to Mark (London: SPCK, 1975).
Tucket 1983a
C. M. Tuckett, The Revival of the Griesbach Hypothesis: An Analysis and Appraisal (Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 44; Cambridge: University Press, 1983).
Tuckett 1983b
Christopher Tuckett, ed., The Messianic Secret (Issues in Religion and Theology 1; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1983).
Tuckett 1983c, * 1999
C. M. Tuckett, "The Beatitudes: A Source-Critical Study. With a Reply by M. D. Goulder," Novum Testamentum 25 (1983): 193-216.
* Reprinted in The Synoptic Problem and Q (Orton 1999: 180-204).
Tuckett 1984a
C. M. Tuckett, "On the Relationship Between Matthew and Luke," New Testament Studies 30 (1984) 130-42.
Tuckett 1984b
C. M. Tuckett, ed., Synoptic Studies: The Ampleforth Conferences of 1982 and 1983 (Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 7; Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1984).
Tuckett 1984c
C. M. Tuckett, "Arguments from Order: Definition and Evaluation" in Synoptic Studies (Tuckett 1984b: 197-219).
Tuckett 1987
Christopher Tuckett, Reading the New Testament: Methods of Interpretation (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987).
Tuckett 1992
C. M. Tuckett, "Synoptic Problem" in Anchor Bible Dictionary (Freedman 1992: 6:263-70).
Tuckett 1993
Christopher M. Tuckett, "Mark and Q" in Synoptic Gospels (Focant 1993: 149-175)
Tuckett 1995a
Christopher M. Tuckett, "Jesus and the Gospels" in The New Interpreter's Bible: A Commentary in Twelve Volumes 8 (Nashville: Abington, 1995): 71-86.
Tuckett 1995b
Christopher M. Tuckett, "The Existence of Q" in Gospel Behind the Gospels (Piper 1995: 19-47).
Tuckett 1996
Christopher M. Tuckett, Q and the History of Early Christianity: Studies on Q (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1996).
Tuilier 1995
André Tuilier, "La Didachè et le Problème Synoptique" [The Didache and the Synoptic Problem] in The Didache in Context: Essays on Its Text, History and Transmission, ed., Clayton N. Jefford (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995).
Tyson 1984
Joseph B. Tyson, The New Testament and Early Christianity (New York: Macmillan, 1984).
Tyson 1985
Joseph B. Tyson, "The Two-Source Hypothesis: A Critical Appraisal" in Two-Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 437-52).
Vaganay 1954
L. Vaganay, Le Problème Synoptique: Une Hypothèse de Travail [The Synoptic Problem: A Working Hypothesis] (Bibliothèque de Théologie: Série III, vol. 1; Paris: Desclée, 1954).
Van Segbroeck et al. 1992
F. Van Segbroeck et al., eds., The Four Gospels 1992: Festschrift Frans Neirynck (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 100, Leuven: University Press, 1992).
Vasssiliadis 1978, * 1999
Petros Vassiliadis, "The Nature and Extent of the Q-Document," Novum Testamentum 20 (1978): 49-73.
* Reprinted in Synoptic Problem and Q (Orton 1999: 138-62).
Vinson 1984
Richard Bolling Vinson, The Significance of the Minor Agreements as an Argument Against the Two-Document Hypothesis (Ph.D. diss.; Duke U., 1984).
Walker 1978
William O. Walker, Jr., ed. The Relationship among the Gospels: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue (Trinity University Monograph Series in Religion 5; San Antonio: Trinity University Press, 1978).
Weeden 1971
Theodore J. Weeden, Mark - Traditions in Conflict (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971).
Weisse 1838
Christian Hermann Weisse, Die evangelische Geschichte kritisch und philosopisch bearbeitet [The Gospel History Critically and Philosophically Treated] (Leipzig, 1838).
Weisse 1856
Christian Hermann Weisse, Die Evangelienfrage in ihrem gegenwärtigen Stadium [The Question of the Gospels at the Present Stage] (1856).
Wenham 1992
John Wenham, Redating Matthew, Mark & Luke: A Fresh Assault on the Synoptic Problem (Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity, 1992).
Wernle 1899
Paul Wernle, Die synoptische Frage [The Synoptic Question] (Freiburg i. B.: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1899).
Westcott 1851, 2 1860, 7 1888
Brooke Foss Westcott, Elements of the Gospel Harmony (1851), rev. Introduction to the Study of the Gospels (2d ed., 1860; 7th ed., London: Macmillan, 1888).
Wheeler 1985
Frank Wheeler, Textual Criticism and the Synoptic Problem: A Textual Commentary on the Minor Agreements of Matthew and Luke Against Mark (Ph.D. diss.; Baylor Univ., 1985).
Wilke 1838
Christian Gottlob Wilke, Der Urevangelist oder exegetisch-kritische Untersuchung über das Verwandtschaftsverhältnis der drei ersten Evangelien [The Original Evangelist or Exegetical Critical Investigation into the Interrelationships of the First Three Gospels] (Dresden & Leipzig, 1838).
Williams 1996
Matthew C. Williams, Is Matthew a Scribe? An Examination of the Text-Critical Argument for the Synoptic Problem (Ph.D. diss.; Trinity Int'l Univ., 1996).
Wilson 1990
Craig Robert Wilson, The Synoptic Problem: A Case Study in the Control of Knowledge (Ed.D. diss.; Columbia Univ. Teachers Col., 1990).
Wood 1953-54, * 1985
H. G. Wood, "The Priority of Mark," Expository Times 65 (1953-54) 17-19.
* Reprinted in Two-Source Hypothesis (Bellinzoni 1985: 77-84).
Woods 1890
F. H. Woods, "The Origin and Mutual Relation of the Synoptic Gospels" in Studia Biblica et Ecclesiastica: Essays Chiefly in Biblical and Patristic Criticism, by members of the University of Oxford 2 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1890): 59-104.
On-line version, ed., Stephen C. Carlson at Synoptic Problem.
Wrede 1901, ET 1971
William Wrede, Das Messiasgeheimnis in den Evangelien (1901), English trans. by J. C. G. Grieg, The Messianic Secret (Library of Theological Translations; Cambridge: James Clarke, 1971).
Zahn 1897, ET 1909
Theodor Zahn, Introduction to the New Testament, trans. from the 3d German ed. by Trout et al. (1909).
Stephen C. Carlson
Created: September 14, 1999
Revised: April 02, 2001
Return to Synoptic Problem Home Page