NICHIREN SHOSHU NEWS UPDATES
Chief Priest in Shimonoseki
Arrested for Alleged Lewd Behaviour, Mainichi Daily, Sept 28, 2004
On September 27, the Ori-o Police Station in Fukuoka Prefecture arrested
Taketomi Doshin (aged 39), chief priest of a temple in Shimonoseki city, for the
alleged violation of the Article for the Healthy Upbringing of Juvenile through
his lewd behaviour.
According to investigations, at around 2 pm on September 10, Taketomi allegedly
made lewd advances on a third year high school female student (aged 17) from
Okagaki-cho at a hotel in Onga-cho. Taketomi was fully aware of the fact that
she was under-aged. The two got to know one another through "Two-shot Dial" at
the end of July. Taketomi admitted "having intimate relations with the student
on 4 or 5 occasions".
The student's mother found her daughter acting rather suspiciously and found out
the truth when she confronted her daughter. The mother made her daughter arrange
a meeting with Taketomi near her residence. When Taketomi noticed the mother, he
tried to run away in his car but accidentally knocked into the mother. The
police officer discovered the truth about Taketomi's lewd behavior during his
investigation of this accident report.
"Two-shot Dial": A telephone service where a computer arranges members of the
opposite sex to meet. It has been misused and has become a cause for social
concerns as it has become the cause of many sexual crimes recently.
BRAZILIAN HIGH COURT
REJECTS NICHIREN SHOSHU APPEAL FOR THE SECOND TIME,
May 19, 2004
On April 1, the Sao Paulo State Appellate Court dismissed an appeal filed by
Nichiren Shoshu over rightful ownership of the former Ichijo-ji temple, now
called the SGI-Brazil Josho (ever-victorious) center. The appeal followed an
earlier decision by the same appellate court, which upheld the Brazilian Supreme
Court ruling rejecting the priesthood's claims that it was the rightful owner of
the facility.
Nichiren Shoshu has argued that the facility's executive director, an SGI-Brazil
member, was replaced by a Nichiren Shoshu believer in a June 1991 board of
directors meeting. Although the Supreme Court and other lower courts have since
ruled that the termination of the executive director's position was wrongful and
invalid, Nichiren Shoshu is granted the right to appeal the decisions under
Brazilian law if a suit is filed within two years of the final court decision.
TOKYO COURT THROWS OUT LAWSUIT AGAINST SOKA GAKKAI
On March 25, the Tokyo District Court dismissed a civil suit filed by Toshimitsu
Ryu, a former Komeito Tokyo Assembly Member, and seven other plaintiffs against
the Tokyo Metropolitan Government. The eight plaintiffs charged that the Tokyo
government should levy taxes on Soka Gakkai culture centers because the lay
Buddhist organization, having been excommunicated by Nichiren Shoshu in 1991,
was no longer entitled to tax exemptions as a religious corporation.
The plaintiffs also claimed that it was illegal for the Soka Gakkai to use its
facilities for the purposes of political campaign activities.
Tokyo District Court presiding judge Masayuki Fujiyama rejected their claims as
legally flawed and inadmissible.
It should also be noted that the Soka Gakkai has been registered as an
independent religious corporation since 1952. Also, Japanese law does not
prohibit religious groups to use their facilities for electoral activities.
SUPREME COURT DISMISSES NICHIREN SHOSHU APPEAL ON ‘GEISHA PHOTO’ CASE
March 8, 2004
On Feb. 24, the Japanese Supreme Court, presided by Judge Toshihiro Kanatani,
dismissed an appeal filed by Nichiren Shoshu, ending the legal battle over the
so-called ″Geisha Photo Case″ in favor of the Soka Gakkai.
The priesthood claimed that the publication of photographs taken in 1986 in
several articles in the Soka Shimpo, a Soka Gakkai newspaper, showing
Nichiren Shoshu High Priest Nikken Abe in the company of paid female escorts,
constituted defamation. The plaintiff (Nichiren Shoshu and Taiseki-ji Main
Temple), naming the Soka Gakkai and SGI President Ikeda as defendants, sought
excessive monetary damages. The photographs in question were taken at an
expensive Japanese restaurant in Tokyo and provided to Soka Shimpo by
reformist priest Rev. Hosho Shiina (who passed away last year) to question the
high priest’s integrity as a spiritual leader. Some of the photos were modified
to protect the identities of those unrelated to the matter at the request of
Rev. Shiina.
Although the Tokyo District Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff’s partial
claims and ordered the defendants to pay damages, the Soka Gakkai filed an
appeal with the Tokyo High Court, which overturned the lower court’s decision in
2000.
The High Court stated that: ″Throughout the history of Nichiren Shoshu, there
have been cases where the qualification of the high priest of the time was
challenged by priests and lay believers and the high priest was asked to resign
because of his doctrinal deviation or improper conduct. It was thus a matter of
fact that such high priests were removed from their position. Argument or
actions against the current high priest to question his competency were
undertaken with the intention of protecting the correct Buddhist teachings and
Nichiren Shoshu. Consequently they should not be construed as being targeted
against Nichiren Shoshu.″
Nichiren Shoshu and Taiseki-ji then sought a final decision from the Japanese
Supreme Court, which upheld the appellate court’s ruling by dismissing the
priesthood’s appeal.
BRAZILIAN COURT REJECTS NICHIREN SHOSHU APPEAL
The Federal Supreme Court of Sao Paulo state recently dismissed a lawsuit filed
by Nichiren Shoshu seeking to overturn a March 2000 Supreme Court ruling that
evicted the priesthood from Ichijo-ji temple, returning it to the possession of
its rightful owners, SGI-Brazil.
According to the Feb. 13, 2004, Sao Paulo Court Registrar, the Superior Court
ruled ″there exists no legal basis for an appeal.″
The legal battle over Ichijo-ji temple building, which has since been renamed
Josho Kaikan (Ever Victorious Center), began in 1991, when Nichiren Shoshu
attempted to replace an SGI-Brazil trustee of the facility with an individual
associated with the priesthood. The SGI trustee then filed suit against the
move, which was declared to be illegal by three Brazilian courts. Under
Brazilian law, however, parties are entitled to contest any verdict within two
years of its ruling. Nichiren Shoshu filed its suit on April 24, 2002, but with
the recent dismissal, has lost legal recourse to the contested facility.
TOKYO DISTRICT COURT DISMISSES ANTI-SOKA GAKKAI SUIT
On Jan. 26, the Tokyo District Court dismissed a civil suit against the Soka
Gakkai and the sales distribution and advertisement commissioning agencies of
three major Japanese newspapers.
The lawsuit, filed by Hozumi Yano, Daito Asaki and his daughter, Naoko, in 1997,
alleged that the defendants illegally denied distribution of the Higashi
Murayama Shimin Shimbun, a newsletter published by the plaintiffs.
District Court Judge Toshiko Kobayashi ruled that there was no evidence that
members of the Soka Gakkai pressured the agencies to exclude the newsletter from
the ad supplements of such national dailies as the Yomiuri and Asahi,
absolving the lay Buddhist group of any involvement. The judge further stated
that the decision not to distribute the newsletter, which contained libelous
allegations against the Soka Gakkai, did not constitute a breach of contract
between the plaintiffs and agencies being sued.
The Seikyo Shimbun describes Hozumi Yano -- who, along with the two
Asakis, is a legislator of the Higashi Murayama City Assembly -- as
″litigation-happy.″ He has sued a shop owner of a clothing store that pressed
for a shoplifting charge against Akiyo Asaki (a fellow assemblywoman who jumped
to her death in 1995), and the various emergency medical services involved in
the incident. He and the two surviving Asakis later claimed in tabloid magazine
interviews that the Soka Gakkai was involved in Akiyo’s death, despite the fact
that the police as well as the public prosecutor’s office have determined her
death to be a suicide. The Soka Gakkai has won all five court cases related to
the so-called Asaki incident. (For further details, see JUSTICE CHRONICLE No.
158 and 160.)
February 2001
High School Acolyte Leaves Head Temple
Recently, an acolyte
who is a third-year student in a high school, seceded from the Nichiren Shoshu Head
Temple. His parents are members of the
Hokkeko Group. He began to harbour doubts
about the integrity of the head temple from the physical abuses he suffered at the Dai-bo. He has decided to leave the head temple as he
wants to pursue his studies in an ordinary university.
The acolytes at the head temple study at the Fuji Gaku-bayashi University. However, the certificate from this university is
not officially recognized in the Japanese society. The
acolyte submitted his letter of secession to Nikken on February 8.
Nikken
Loses Three Lawsuits Consecutively
1.
Lost
the Seattle lawsuit last March.
2.
Lost
the "Geisha photo" lawsuit last December
3. Lost libel suit last December (Nikken was sued by a priest who seceded from the head temple for defamation. This was because of Nikken commented that the priest "seceded because he wanted money.")
Because of his
consecutive defeats, Nikken is said to be crying out, "Why
is it that it's always ME who lose!"
Nikken denied the High Sanctuary of True Buddhism
On January 1, Nikken
said the following at the New Year Gongyo Meeting :
"Even if we attain
kosen-rufu, we will never establish the actual High Santuary of True Buddhism. We will never do something as nonsensical as
that." Alas, Nikken has come to a stage
where he has completely denied the importance of establishing the actual High Santuary of
True Buddhism, which is the will of Nichiren Daishonin.
This has given rise to
new doubts among the Hokkeko members -- If this is the case, then why is the priesthood
collecting such a huge amount of donation from the members to build the Hoan-do? For what purpose is the priesthood building the
Hoan-do.
No Progress In the Priesthood's Shakubuku Campaign
In Japan, there are some 500 temples. Last year, only 10%, that is 50 temples achieved their shakubuku target.
At a meeting for danto
leaders, one senior leader called forth to the crowd,
"If we do not carry out shakubuku to increase our danto membership by 2
or 3 times, it will be impossible to realize the 300,000 Pilgrimage to the Head Temple
next year." Through this comment, it has
become clear that the priesthood is facing great difficulty in realizing the 300,000
Pilgrimage to the Head Temple scheduled for next year.