Click here for Access Macon



Editorials for Thursday, February 17, 2000    Monday | Tuesday | Wednesday | Thursday | Friday | Weekend


Search our site


Opinion
Letters

Columns
Ed Corson
R.L. Day
Charles E. Richardson
Ron Woodgeard

Services
E-The People
Straight Talk Forums

Resources
About us
Contact us

OUR VIEWS


Road critics should fall back in wake of edict

We hope CAUTION Macon will let the state of Georgia and Bibb County quit spending our money fighting its efforts to stop the five-laning of Houston Road.

The critics of the Road Improvement Program had their day in court - actually, four days in January. U.S. District Judge Duross Fitzpatrick held hearings on their request for a preliminary injunction halting the bulldozers in their tracks pending a decision on the suit they had filed in October. That suit sought to stop federal funding for the $8 million project on the grounds that Georgia's Department of Transportation had not adequately considered its environmental effects.

State and federal highway officials testified in the January hearing that their environmental assessment projected no significant ill effects on surrounding neighborhoods. The CAUTION Macon folks said this finding was arbitrary and capricious, the kind of assessment a fox might make in the henhouse. But Monday Judge Fitzpatrick ruled against them. He said the defendants had acted properly in making their assessment.

The judge's finding on the legitimacy of the environmental study suggests that CAUTION Macon is not likely to win its broader case either - although it can appeal the injunction decision and keep fighting its case as grading and widening follow the work already done. The judge observed the courts "have a limited role to play matters such as this."

It has been apparent from the beginning that the Road Improvement Program saw Houston Road as its line in the sand. On its behalf, the county has run up more than $63,000 in legal expenses fighting the suit and the state attorney general's office has also made a significant investment of taxpayer money.

We wouldn't call CAUTION Macon's intervention frivolous; it raised genuine concerns which should have been addressed earlier and more fully by the Road Improvement Program. But the court has signaled, and the road's critics might as well fall back and fight again another day, on another front.

Ed Corson/For the editorial board

Go To CAUTION Macon News  

CAUTION Macon News Release: [not published]  

Lessons from the CAUTION lawsuit against the Macon/Bibb County Road Improvement Program.

The recent Federal court decision to deny CAUTION Macon's request for a restraining order on Houston Road was an unfortunate decision for our city. The judge limited the case to procedural issues, rather than the substantive and very explicit requirements of federal law for effective planning, cost-effective design, sensitivity to the social and environmental issues, and effective public input. We as plaintiffs had the burden of demonstrating that the required processes for proper conduct of an Environmental Assessment were violated, and that the violation resulted in serious damage to the plaintiffs.

The judge concluded that, due to the ambiguity regarding Federal environmental requirements, interpretation of those requirements is left solely to federal agencies. Logically, this ruling regards any "finding of no significant impact" as indisputable. CAUTION Macon is currently consulting with its attorney to determine the advisability of an appealCAUTION Macon would obviously have preferred to win its injunction to stop the five-laning of Houston Road. Despite the ruling we feel victorious in several ways:

-We have successfully influenced moderation of the design of several projects.

- Federal and State DOT representatives appeared embarrassed by the superficial and flawed analysis reflected in the Houston Road Project's Environmental Assessment; we anticipate that future assessments will not be so readily rubber-stamped by either agency. Hopefully, federal, state and local agencies will realize that their omissions cause serious harm to the citizens they are pledged to protect.

- We have made Bibb County citizens aware of the heavy-handed and often poorly planned engineering guiding our road program.

- We as citizens are much more savvy concerning road issues, and even more appalled at the serious failure of the Road Improvement Program to protect our neighborhoods and quality of life. We have learned what should be expected of road projects using state and federal funds; these lessons will make us vigilant and effective in examining future road projects.

It is a sad day indeed when citizens are forced to turn to the courts as a forum for their input. We hope in the future that there will be an open and frank exchange of ideas between citizens and officials of the Road Improvement Program. We also hope and that community concerns will be incorporated into the planning of future projects; the people who live in the neighborhoods and use the roads are most intimately acquainted with their usage patterns and problems.

In the meantime, we urge the Citizens of Macon and Bibb County to be vigilant and be involved! Demand good government, proper planning, and responsible use of our tax dollars!

Letters to the editors

Columns
The case for cockfighting -- R.L. Day

Editorial Board
Cecil Bentley
Ron Woodgeard
R.L. Day
Ed Corson
Charles E. Richardson

General Information
(912) 744-4319

FAX
(912) 744-4385

 

Back to top | Back to macontelegraph.com | Send a letter to the editors
 


©1999 The Macon Telegraph Publishing Company. The information you receive online from macontelegraph.com is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright-protected material.

Shopping