Books and
Cooks West
January 2004
A Bed for the Night: Humanitarianism in Crisis
by David Rieff
A Bed for the Night: Humanitarianism in Crisis
by David Rieff
Sonia's boyfriend's place
Saturday, January 25 at 5:30 PM
Vegetable cheesecake with salsa, peppers with bean dip, fennel salad, rice salad, champaign, brownies
Our rating: 2.7 cups of tea!
From Publishers Weekly
Noted journalist Rieff (Slaughterhouse: Bosnia and the Failure of the West)
presents a painful, urgent and penetrating discussion of a crisis most of us
didn't even know existed and yet which cuts to the heart of the West's role in
some of the most violent world events of the past decade. He will shake
readers' complacency about the relief work done by organizations like Oxfam,
CARE and Doctors without Borders, crushing the belief that humanitarian aid is
a panacea for all the world's ills. Rieff rejects "the false morality play"
that, in any given conflict, there are victimizers and innocent victims, and
that it is always clear who is who. In Rwanda, for instance, he reports that
aid workers went into refugee camps threatened with cholera-but the "victims"
they helped, the Hutu refugees, were in fact the killers who had committed,
and were planning to resume, the genocide of the Tutsis. Rieff's despair over
such incidents is palpable, but his rage is reserved for the Western
governments that fund, and exploit, the aid organizations. In his most potent
chapters, Rieff excoriates the U.S. and its European allies for hiding behind
a "fig leaf" in Bosnia and Rwanda, offering humanitarian aid in lieu of taking
effective, i.e., military, action, to end genocide. Rieff shows how
humanitarian organizations have colluded in their own exploitation by Western
donor governments, as they have become confused about their mission and
purpose. Originally, he explains, these groups were independent, politically
neutral agents, with the limited goal of bringing relief in famine or war. But
simply bringing relief-and making no change in the political and economic
realities that create need-can be frustrating work. Hoping to increase their
effectiveness, some aid organizations have espoused larger goals, such as
human rights or even opposing oppressive governments-as in the war in
Afghanistan, in which aid groups took orders from the U.S. and in effect
became part of the military effort that brought down the Taliban. Much of what
Rieff says will be unpalatable particularly to some on the left-for instance,
his assertion that development aid creates dependency in recipient countries
and that humanitarian aid is a latter-day version of the "white man's burden";
and his conviction that wars-including the war in Afghanistan-can be necessary
and just. None of his criticism of humanitarian groups diminishes his
admiration for those he calls "the last of the just" for their dedication and
courage in aiding the needy. Still, he writes of the current state of the
world, "I see little if any empirical basis for optimism." Readers may share
his despair, but they will come away from this passionate, eloquent argument
with a distinctly clearer understanding of the complex moral issues facing
humanitarian aid in a world filled with brutality and suffering.
