Julian's Jabberings

Books reviews, current events, and other musings



Monday, May 31, 2004
The US and its puppet government in Iraq can't agree on who should be president.
The U.S.-led occupation authority ordered Iraq's Governing Council on Monday to postpone a vote on nominating a president because the council's favored candidate is opposed by the authority, council members said. Some members angrily accused the occupation authority of attempting to impose a choice on them.
They should, in the spirit of American democracy, ask the Supreme Court to decide.

Here's the US experience closes to the Iraqi occupation (from Daily Kos).
Indeed, the leading expert on the Philippines war said he finds the U.S. military experience there strikingly similar to the U.S. foray into Iraq.

"Both the Philippine and Iraq wars were seen as imperial conflicts and as radical departures from previous foreign policy," said Texas A&M's Brian M. Linn.
Iraq has often reminded me of the US conquest of the Phillipines, but this is the first time I've seen anyone else describe the similarities.



In Bushwhacked: Life in George W. Bush’s America, Molly Ivins and Lou Dubose investigate the impact of the Bush Presidency. A few of the chapters cover material that’s familiar to any news junkie: corporate contributions to Bush, the Bush tax cuts, and the war in Iraq. The rest of the book proves more worthwhile, though equally depressing, by discussing administration decisions that didn’t make the front pages but still had a significant influence on the well-being of the nation’s population.

Bush refused to extend unemployment benefits, despite increased unemployment during the recession. The Labor Department scrapped ergonomic regulations, years in the making, which would have done a great deal to help the nation’s labor force. In response to the “No Child Left Behind” initiative, schools pressure poor students to drop out and classes drill against the standardized exams, all in an effort to improve the all-important test scores. Congressional Republicans and Bush abolished the Superfund tax, so no money is available to clean up environmental disaster areas. Bush weakened USDA food inspections, leading to deaths from Listeria bacteria and other nasty contaminants. Unregulated groundwater pollution from coal-bed methane extraction in Wyoming is destroying the local environment and the ranches. Bush refused to release funds for warming houses in the winter. Bushwhacked explains how Enron, with support from Bush, screwed investors, employees, and utility customers. Bush has appointed some scary right-wing nut cases to the federal judiciary.

His foreign policies have been disastrous – opposing the Kyoto protocol on global warning, scrapping the ABM treaty so National Missile Defense could proceed, backing out of the Biological Weapons Convention, and weakening the Small Arms Control Treaty. He abandoned a Clinton plan to challenge international money laundering, often used by terrorists and drug dealers. The US rejected the International Criminal Court. He dismantled Clinton’s agreements with North Korea, and as a result North Korea is accelerating their nuclear weapons production. All of this, of course, is in addition to the mess in Iraq.

Bushwhacked made me even angrier about how much damage the Bush White House has done, to the nation and to the world. Every policy of theirs goes against the public interest, since the corporate right-wing fundamentalist agenda is all that matters to them. Ivins doesn’t provide the humorous zingers the way she used to, but her message is on target and important.

Sunday, May 30, 2004
Here is an example of right-wing thinking, or the lack thereof, regarding the situation in Iraq. Victor Davis Hanson, a classicist and military historian, wrote the essay, which appears on the Benador Associates website.
There is a certain number of Iraqi terrorists that either need to give up, reconsider their militancy, leave the country, or be killed for there to be peace and the emergence of a consensual government.
After all, a fix number of Iraqis have the title "terrorist" on their business cards. And once we wipe out those miscreants, everything in Iraq will be hunky-dory.
Again, we do not know how many fatalities we as a nation can endure, only that in our present postmodern society the number for good or evil is far lower than was true in World War II, Korea, or Vietnam.
Damn those postmodernists! Or, possibly, Americans viewed defeating the Nazis or the Communists as higher priorities than maintaining an unpopular occupation of far less strategic importance.
We who value life as much as they profess allegiance to death rightly accept this terrible imbalance and thus are understandably frantic to find a way to target the insurrectionists without losing any more of our own.
Of course, "we who value life" have killed ten times as many people in Iraq as "they [who] profess allegiance to death".
So as these parameters of action crystallize in Iraq, it is important that the US military be allowed to go on the offensive and take out the obstacles to democratic reform before we lose all public support for the war.
In other words, the only thing keeping the US from winning the widespread support of the Iraqi people is the fact that we haven't killed enough Iraqis.

Skewering the jingoistic mindset is an amusing intellectual exercise.