|
Julian's Jabberings
|
|
Books reviews, current events, and other
musings
Home Bio Books Photos Archives ![]() Send comments to JulianJabberer@ yahoo.com Weblogs Baghdad Burning BookNotes Counterspin Central Cursor Daily Kos Divinest Sense Donkey Rising Eschaton Ghost in the Machine Isomorphisms Kristin Buxton Nathan Newman La Di Da Legal Fiction Medley No War Blog Now This Political Aims rebecca's pocket Talking Points Memo This Modern World Vlorbik Whisky Bar Mass media Dave Barry Guardian Molly Ivins New York Times Paul Krugman San Jose Mercury News TAPPED The Nation Washington Monthly Washington Post Geek stuff Artima.com Cedric Chris Pratley Joel on Software Ward's Wiki Other sites Arts and Letter Daily Books & Cooks West Click Mazes Common Dreams Democratic Underground In Passing Political Humor The Onion Three Way Action |
Friday, July 30, 2004
I watched way too many political speeches over
the last few days. Kerry
gave a surprisingly strong speech, which aims his campaign on the way
towards victory. Edwards, an excellent speaker, wasn’t in top form but
still did just fine. Wesley Clark was impressive; he would have been a
serious contender in the primaries had he spoken that well on the
campaign trail. Illinois Senatorial candidate Barack
Obama displayed the incredible talent and charisma that has
transformed him into a rising star of the Democratic Party. I also
liked Steve Brozak,
a retired Marine lieutenant colonel and investment banker who left the
Republican Party in disgust over the situation in Iraq, is now running
for Congress as a Democrat.
I have a mixed overall reaction to the convention, for reasons that Legal Fiction touches on. I’ll write up my thoughts later. Monday, July 26, 2004
Here's what I thought of today's convention
speeches.
Gore gave a fantastic speech. Had he been as good a speaker during his campaign as he's been since then, he'd now be President. He dealt with the 2000 results perfectly, with the right mixture of humor and regret. His message to each segment of the electorate was on target: telling Democrats to transfer their frustration into support for Kerry, asking Bush voters whether they're pleased with how things turned out, and pointing out to Nader supporters that Republicans and Democrats aren’t the same. Plus, he displayed more charisma than he ever has before (which isn't saying much). My reaction to Carter's speech was more mixed. I was surprised how strongly he criticized Bush. Still, it makes sense for the human rights President to tear apart the Abu Ghraib President. That attitude, along with his condemnation of pre-emptive war, might resonate with Americans who are troubled by the immorality of recent US actions. However, Carter's oratory was rather low-energy; even the convention delegates appeared rather subdued. The first half of Hillary's speech left me flat; she wasn't much of a speaker. However, when she started talking about 9/11, she improved dramatically. When she discusses issues that she deeply cares about, like the hellish scene at Ground Zero or the importance of taking good care of our soldiers, she can voice those heartfelt feelings. However, her rhetorical skills aren't adept enough to pull off the standard "John Kerry, what a guy!" spiel. Bill, on the other hand, totally kicked ass. He demonstrated that he is, by far, the best speaker on the American political scene, with the possible exception of John Edwards. His depiction of Democratic vs. Republican beliefs totally gelled, melding substance and emotion quite well. The contrast between his personal tax cut and America’s needs was humorous and persuasive. It was a very impressive performance. As a whole, the evening presented the Carter-Clinton-Gore-Kerry-Edwards face of the Democratic Party, which the American people can contrast with the Reagan-Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld-Ashcroft face of the Republican Party. Hopefully, the electorate will view the Democratic representation as more appealing. |