Subject: Re: Rand Is GOOD Slack

Date: 13 Dec 1996 00:00:00 GMT

From: 1Ol01O@radix.net (MegaLiz)

Organization: MotPU: Where Binary Moodswings are ALWAYS on the Menu

Newsgroups: alt.slack

References: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4

 

 

 

 

dflync01@starbase.spd.louisville.edu (David F Lynch) wrote:

: John Cook (lifeart@OntheNet.com.au) wrote:

:

: Elucidate. There are people who follow Rand ASIDE from the Randroid

: contingent? I mean, theoretically they could exist, theoretically there

: are probably people who aren't Scientologists but who enjoy the writings

: of L. Ron Hubbard, but I certainly have never met them. Or anyone who

: would admit to it, at least, and this could be a big difference.

 

Well, SURE, it's possible to have degrees of Randianism. I know people

who read _Atlas Shrugged_ and SHRUGGED and then popped it on the shelf

right between Harold Robbins and Danielle Steele. Some people actually

SKIPPED the rants and lapped up the romantic bits, you see. Then there

are those who say, "Wow. This is interesting, even if it is

humorlessly bludgeoning me with a half-baked 'philosophy'". Then,

recognizing that it would be a waste of good life-span to try to be or

to try to find John Galt, they shrug too.

 

It's just a question of WHEN.

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

* Asterisk of sounding serious, I may prefer to remain mysterious.

Fat-free Feet: Not just a tasty breakfast treat.

Want to read about the S.P.E.R.M.? Leave a message with my firm.

If most of this is clear to you, know then what you must not do.