Subject: Re: no noose is good noose
Date: 04 Mar 1999 00:00:00 GMT
From: heyboyo@Whatschmells?com (canned bandicoot)
Reply-To: "Hey! You got a Pahty Ring, too."....."Evebuddy got a pahty ring." ...."An wid a diff'rent stone....Supah Bad."
Organization: "Hey, weah you git dat ring?".... "Dassa Pahty ring." ....."Sho is bad."
References: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4
Blanche Woodlawn <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>Larch Van De Croot explains it all:
>:where did I mention the U.S.?
>I figured the "we" covered it.
>:so? When did I indicate I put any stock in what the panel had to say?
>Not talking about you, I'm talking about the panel.
anyway. Last word on this. Sorry if my previous response seemed pissy
and I seemed to take some things the wrong way. Sometimes I think I'm
a bit touchy about this stuff because I'm AM aware that my overall
take on things DOES tend to be a bit alarmist. Even absurd.
While some of the crap I toss off is deliberately comic and
hyperbolic, there is some real underlying paranoia, and while I wish I
could honestly say I'm ABSOLUTELY sure it comes from an objective
evaluation of available evidence, I have to allow for the possibility
that it might be more honestly attributed to the collection and
selective consideration of evidence required to justify the preformed
conclusions that, perversely, I enjoy coming to. Ten years ago I was
SURE our collective hive would have imploded like a rotten pumpkin by
Ah well. Can't win 'em all. If and when it does, I won't be surprised.
Guess that's the upside.
And how else do I explain all this shit I got to the wife? HONK. Don't
need but one gun to shoot rats.