Subject: Blerk (was Re: Ayn Rand and Objectivism)

Date: 10 Jan 1996 00:00:00 GMT

From: fruitbat@brown.edu (Eric the Fruitbat)

Organization: Central Services

Newsgroups: alt.slack

References: 1 , 2

 

>Really? Just what would you accept as "proof," then? The concept of

>proof is *predicated* on the idea that there are no "contradictory or

>irrational elements" in the universe.

 

No it's not. You're silly. Ever heard of Godel? Ever heard of

"Bob?" Have you ever even HEARD? Just ONCE? Then you'd KNOW from

"CONTRADICTORY," boy, and you'd THINK TWICE about POSTING SOMETHING LIKE

THIS, at THIS place, *NOW* OF ALL TIMES, BY DOBBS!!! And you'd KNOW what

you were GETTING INTO, which you OBVIOUSLY DON'T or your VERMICIOUS

CRANIUM would be HIDDEN SO DEEP in the SAND that you COULDN'T DIG IT OUT

if you USED the SYDNEY OPERA HOUSE as a SHOVEL, and you WOULD have been SO

FAR AWAY SO FAST that you WOULDN'T EVEN have RED-SHIFTED, BOY, you would

be TRAILING RADIO WAVES BY NOW, SPITTING ELECTRON FIRE AND HARD RAD

BRIMSTONE AS YOU SPUTTERED AND FLAMED YOUR SORRY ASS ALL THE WAY TO THE

EIGHTEENTH HELL, YEA, UNTO THE CIRCLE APPOINTED FOR THOSE WHO ARE DWEEBS

AND FLUNKIES, WHO SHALL BE TORMENTED IN ETERNAL TORMENT AT THE MYRIAD

HANDS OF THE MIGHTY G'BROGFRAN, (possibly) LORD OF INFINITE HELLS AND

(maybe) DREAD DEMON OF DARKEST DARKNESS, FUCK ME MIGHTILY IF ALL THAT I

PRONOUNCE SHALL NOT COME TO PASS IN THE LIVES OF THOSE NOW LIVING!!!!!! Oh

yeah.

 

e

 

--

No power, no funky music!